Dave, Enclosed is my rating of the community session proposals Jysoo ----------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Jysoo Lee Principal Researcher KISTI (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) Yusong-Gu, Eoeun-Dong 52-11 Daejon, Korea, 305-806 E-mail: jysoo@kisti.re.kr Phone: (042) 869-0591 Fax: (042) 869-0539 이지수 대전광역시 유성구 어은동 52번지 한국과학기술정보연구원 ----------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: ogf20pc-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ogf20pc-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Berry Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:41 PM To: ogf20pc@ogf.org Subject: [ogf20pc] OGF20 community submissions for ranking Dear PC, Please find attached a spreadsheet that summarises the proposals received via the CFP. Our immediate task is to rank the submissions on the first sheet, which lists the workshop proposals. As discussed, please use the following ranking: 1 - Not suitable for OGF. 2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should only be included if we need to fill slots. 3 - A good session that fits all or most of the criteria; to be included if slots is available. 4 - A good session that fits all the criteria; to be included if possible. 5 - An excellent session that should be included no matter what Do add comments where appropriate, e.g. if you wish to recommend merging with another session, or accepting with fewer sessions. Please mail your rankings to me and I will summarise. We will discuss the results on next Tuesday's call. Note: non-workshop proposals have been moved to the other sheets - Enterprise sessions, Grid Means Business, and Other. Please note that these sheets do not show the complete line-up for these tracks; only those submitted via the CFP. Best wishes, Dave Berry Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039

Dave, Is there a definitive list of criteria against which these proposals should be ranked? Stephen ________________________________ From: ogf20pc-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ogf20pc-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Berry Sent: 15 February 2007 12:41 To: ogf20pc@ogf.org Subject: [ogf20pc] OGF20 community submissions for ranking Dear PC, Please find attached a spreadsheet that summarises the proposals received via the CFP. Our immediate task is to rank the submissions on the first sheet, which lists the workshop proposals. As discussed, please use the following ranking: 1 - Not suitable for OGF. 2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should only be included if we need to fill slots. 3 - A good session that fits all or most of the criteria; to be included if slots is available. 4 - A good session that fits all the criteria; to be included if possible. 5 - An excellent session that should be included no matter what Do add comments where appropriate, e.g. if you wish to recommend merging with another session, or accepting with fewer sessions. Please mail your rankings to me and I will summarise. We will discuss the results on next Tuesday's call. Note: non-workshop proposals have been moved to the other sheets - Enterprise sessions, Grid Means Business, and Other. Please note that these sheets do not show the complete line-up for these tracks; only those submitted via the CFP. Best wishes, Dave Berry Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039

Dave Please find attached my rankings. I couldn't find any details of the 'Health e-child proposal. Apologies I cannot make the meeting this evening Ron ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Perrott Director, Regional e-Science Centre Queen's University Email :r.perrott@qub.ac.uk Belfast BT7 1NN Tel: 0044(0)2890 975463 UK Fax: 0044(0)2890 975666 ------------------------------------------------------------------- _____ From: ogf20pc-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ogf20pc-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Berry Sent: 15 February 2007 12:41 To: ogf20pc@ogf.org Subject: [ogf20pc] OGF20 community submissions for ranking Dear PC, Please find attached a spreadsheet that summarises the proposals received via the CFP. Our immediate task is to rank the submissions on the first sheet, which lists the workshop proposals. As discussed, please use the following ranking: 1 - Not suitable for OGF. 2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should only be included if we need to fill slots. 3 - A good session that fits all or most of the criteria; to be included if slots is available. 4 - A good session that fits all the criteria; to be included if possible. 5 - An excellent session that should be included no matter what Do add comments where appropriate, e.g. if you wish to recommend merging with another session, or accepting with fewer sessions. Please mail your rankings to me and I will summarise. We will discuss the results on next Tuesday's call. Note: non-workshop proposals have been moved to the other sheets - Enterprise sessions, Grid Means Business, and Other. Please note that these sheets do not show the complete line-up for these tracks; only those submitted via the CFP. Best wishes, Dave Berry Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039