Dear Dave and others,
Please find my ratings and a few comments
attached.
Greetings,
Kimmo
From:
ogf20pc-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ogf20pc-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Berry
Sent: 15. helmikuuta 2007 14:41
To: ogf20pc@ogf.org
Subject: [ogf20pc] OGF20 community
submissions for ranking
Dear PC,
Please find attached a spreadsheet that summarises the
proposals received via the CFP. Our immediate task is to rank
the submissions on the first sheet, which lists the workshop proposals.
As discussed, please use the following ranking:
1 - Not suitable for OGF.
2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should
only be included if we need to fill slots.
3 - A good session that fits all or most of the
criteria; to be included if slots is available.
4 - A good session that fits all the
criteria; to be included if possible.
5 - An excellent session that should be included no
matter what
Do add comments where appropriate, e.g. if you wish to
recommend merging with another session, or accepting with fewer sessions.
Please mail your rankings to me and I will summarise.
We will discuss the results on next Tuesday's call.
Note: non-workshop proposals have been moved to the other
sheets -
Best wishes,
Dave Berry
Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development
National e-Science Centre,