Dear PC,

Please find attached a spreadsheet that summarises the proposals received via the CFP. Our immediate task is to rank the submissions on the first sheet, which lists the workshop proposals. As discussed, please use the following ranking:

1 - Not suitable for OGF.

2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should only be included if we need to fill slots.

3 - A good session that fits all or most of the criteria; to be included if slots is available.

4 - A good session that fits all the criteria; to be included if possible.

5 - An excellent session that should be included no matter what

Do add comments where appropriate, e.g. if you wish to recommend merging with another session, or accepting with fewer sessions.

Please mail your rankings to me and I will summarise. We will discuss the results on next Tuesday's call.

Note: non-workshop proposals have been moved to the other sheets - Enterprise sessions, Grid Means Business, and Other. Please note that these sheets do not show the complete line-up for these tracks; only those submitted via the CFP.

Best wishes,

Dave Berry

Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development

National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street

Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039