Dear
PC,
Please find
attached a spreadsheet that summarises the proposals received via the
CFP. Our immediate task is to rank the submissions on the
first sheet, which lists the workshop proposals. As discussed, please
use the following ranking:
1 - Not suitable
for OGF.
2 - A session that
fails some of the criteria and should only be included if we need to fill
slots.
3 - A good
session that fits all or most of the criteria; to be included if slots is
available.
4 - A
good session that fits all the criteria; to be included if
possible.
5 - An
excellent session that should be included no matter
what
Do add comments
where appropriate, e.g. if you wish to recommend merging with another session,
or accepting with fewer sessions.
Please mail your
rankings to me and I will summarise. We will discuss the results
on next Tuesday's call.
Note: non-workshop
proposals have been moved to the other sheets - Enterprise sessions, Grid
Means Business, and Other. Please note that these sheets do not show the
complete line-up for these tracks; only those submitted via the
CFP.
Best
wishes,
Dave Berry
Deputy Director, Research &
E-infrastructure Development
National e-Science Centre,
15 South College Street
Edinburgh, EH8
9AA
+44 131 651 4039