At the end of the call, Steve wondered whether an alternative approach might be better - relate properties to grammar constructs. Then everything is driven from the grammar. Regards Steve Hanson IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK Architect, IBM DFDL Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group smh@uk.ibm.com tel:+44-1962-815848 mob:+44-7717-378890 Note: I work Tuesday to Friday From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com> To: DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg@ogf.org> Date: 30/04/2020 00:02 Subject: [EXTERNAL] [DFDL-WG] what do you think of this for Section 22 Property Precedence Sent by: "dfdl-wg" <dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org> I just revamped the first section in the attached MS-Word nested table structure. This is tedious to assemble, but I think does a better job than just the indented trees particularly given the fact that we ran out of indent levels. I'm curious whether this is better/clearer. There's also a few comment bubbles where I discovered things I didn't understand or were surprising to me. Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Owl Cyber Defense | www.owlcyberdefense.com Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy -- dfdl-wg mailing list dfdl-wg@ogf.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ogf.org_mailman_listinfo_dfdl-2Dwg&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=AJa9ThEymJXYnOqu84mJuw&m=Ac4CLfTyE-dl-Rg1XNFaJt6dYRTlSWAqUJzxDwME3qA&s=h2WjqAeWfccHXcEjMW4tR1LEA_iWH-UyemhBkFiG9ZA&e= Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU