At the end of the call, Steve wondered whether an alternative approach might be better - relate properties to grammar constructs. Then everything is driven from the grammar.

Regards

Steve Hanson

IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
mob:+44-7717-378890
Note: I work Tuesday to Friday

From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To: DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>
Date: 30/04/2020 00:02
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [DFDL-WG] what do you think of this for Section 22 Property Precedence
Sent by: "dfdl-wg" <dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org>

I just revamped the first section in the attached MS-Word nested table structure.

This is tedious to assemble, but I think does a better job than just the indented trees particularly given the fact that we ran out of indent levels.

I'm curious whether this is better/clearer.

There's also a few comment bubbles where I discovered things I didn't understand or were surprising to me.

Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Owl Cyber Defense | www.owlcyberdefense.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy
-- dfdl-wg mailing list dfdl-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU