Status report: Progress on both the charter and WSNR (WS Naming resolution). RNS moved back to GFS until through document publication, i.e., after public comment Resolution modification to support base profile use case done and discussed Open issue remains "names" - which are just a string. Andrew -- Hiro Kishimoto
Hi all, GFSG is now deliberating on WG approval. Attached is the final charter draft submitted by Andrew. https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/naming-wg-charter/en/1 Stay tuned. ---- Hiro Kishimoto Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Status report:
Progress on both the charter and WSNR (WS Naming resolution). RNS moved back to GFS until through document publication, i.e., after public comment Resolution modification to support base profile use case done and discussed Open issue remains "names" - which are just a string.
Andrew
The charter doesn't speak to the separation of WS-RenewableReferences into a separate specification, which I think is important. At 03:04 PM 6/16/2005 +0900, Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Hi all,
GFSG is now deliberating on WG approval. Attached is the final charter draft submitted by Andrew.
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/naming-wg-charter/en/1
Stay tuned. ---- Hiro Kishimoto
Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Status report: Progress on both the charter and WSNR (WS Naming resolution). RNS moved back to GFS until through document publication, i.e., after public comment Resolution modification to support base profile use case done and discussed Open issue remains "names" - which are just a string. Andrew
_______________________________________________________________ Ian Foster www.mcs.anl.gov/~foster Math & Computer Science Div. Dept of Computer Science Argonne National Laboratory The University of Chicago Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A. Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A. Tel: 630 252 4619 Fax: 630 252 1997 Globus Alliance, www.globus.org
Hi Ian,
The charter doesn't speak to the separation of WS-RenewableReferences into a separate specification, which I think is important.
The following text intents to mention that separation.
In order to satisfy the need to define a resolution port-type as soon as possible, the WG may separate WS-naming specification into two specs; ‘WS-Name resolution and the definition of the abstract name. This discussion and decision will be one of the first work items for the group
Hiro Kishimoto Ian Foster wrote:
The charter doesn't speak to the separation of WS-RenewableReferences into a separate specification, which I think is important.
At 03:04 PM 6/16/2005 +0900, Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Hi all,
GFSG is now deliberating on WG approval. Attached is the final charter draft submitted by Andrew.
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/naming-wg-charter/en/1
Stay tuned. ---- Hiro Kishimoto
Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Status report: Progress on both the charter and WSNR (WS Naming resolution). RNS moved back to GFS until through document publication, i.e., after public comment Resolution modification to support base profile use case done and discussed Open issue remains "names" - which are just a string. Andrew
_______________________________________________________________ Ian Foster www.mcs.anl.gov/~foster Math & Computer Science Div. Dept of Computer Science Argonne National Laboratory The University of Chicago Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A. Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A. Tel: 630 252 4619 Fax: 630 252 1997 Globus Alliance, www.globus.org
Ok, thanks. It doesn't seem to me that "renewable references" is necessarily concerned with "name resolution", hence my confusion on that point. At 10:27 PM 6/16/2005 +0900, Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Hi Ian,
The charter doesn't speak to the separation of WS-RenewableReferences into a separate specification, which I think is important.
The following text intents to mention that separation.
In order to satisfy the need to define a resolution port-type as soon as possible, the WG may separate WS-naming specification into two specs; 'WS-Name resolution and the definition of the abstract name. This discussion and decision will be one of the first work items for the group
Hiro Kishimoto
Ian Foster wrote:
The charter doesn't speak to the separation of WS-RenewableReferences into a separate specification, which I think is important.
At 03:04 PM 6/16/2005 +0900, Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Hi all,
GFSG is now deliberating on WG approval. Attached is the final charter draft submitted by Andrew.
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/naming-wg-charter/en/1
Stay tuned. ---- Hiro Kishimoto
Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Status report: Progress on both the charter and WSNR (WS Naming resolution). RNS moved back to GFS until through document publication, i.e., after public comment Resolution modification to support base profile use case done and discussed Open issue remains "names" - which are just a string. Andrew
_______________________________________________________________ Ian Foster www.mcs.anl.gov/~foster Math & Computer Science Div. Dept of Computer Science Argonne National Laboratory The University of Chicago Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A. Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A. Tel: 630 252 4619 Fax: 630 252 1997 Globus Alliance, www.globus.org
_______________________________________________________________ Ian Foster www.mcs.anl.gov/~foster Math & Computer Science Div. Dept of Computer Science Argonne National Laboratory The University of Chicago Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A. Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A. Tel: 630 252 4619 Fax: 630 252 1997 Globus Alliance, www.globus.org
Hi Ian, I agree "renewable references" and "name resolution" are not exactly the same things. I think the WG will clarify this point also at their early discussion. Thanks, --- Hiro Kishimoto Ian Foster wrote:
Ok, thanks. It doesn't seem to me that "renewable references" is necessarily concerned with "name resolution", hence my confusion on that point.
At 10:27 PM 6/16/2005 +0900, Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Hi Ian,
The charter doesn't speak to the separation of WS-RenewableReferences into a separate specification, which I think is important.
The following text intents to mention that separation.
In order to satisfy the need to define a resolution port-type as soon as possible, the WG may separate WS-naming specification into two specs; 'WS-Name resolution and the definition of the abstract name. This discussion and decision will be one of the first work items for the group
Hiro Kishimoto
Ian Foster wrote:
The charter doesn't speak to the separation of WS-RenewableReferences into a separate specification, which I think is important.
At 03:04 PM 6/16/2005 +0900, Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Hi all,
GFSG is now deliberating on WG approval. Attached is the final charter draft submitted by Andrew.
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/naming-wg-charter/en/1
Stay tuned. ---- Hiro Kishimoto
Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Status report: Progress on both the charter and WSNR (WS Naming resolution). RNS moved back to GFS until through document publication, i.e., after public comment Resolution modification to support base profile use case done and discussed Open issue remains "names" - which are just a string. Andrew
_______________________________________________________________ Ian Foster www.mcs.anl.gov/~foster Math & Computer Science Div. Dept of Computer Science Argonne National Laboratory The University of Chicago Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A. Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A. Tel: 630 252 4619 Fax: 630 252 1997 Globus Alliance, www.globus.org
_______________________________________________________________ Ian Foster www.mcs.anl.gov/~foster Math & Computer Science Div. Dept of Computer Science Argonne National Laboratory The University of Chicago Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A. Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A. Tel: 630 252 4619 Fax: 630 252 1997 Globus Alliance, www.globus.org
participants (2)
-
Hiro Kishimoto -
Ian Foster