Hi Ian,

> The charter doesn't speak to the separation of WS-RenewableReferences
> into a separate specification, which I think is important.

The following text intents to mention that separation.

> In order to satisfy the need to define a resolution port-type as soon
> as possible, the WG may separate WS-naming specification into two
> specs; ?WS-Name resolution and the definition of the abstract name.
> This discussion and decision will be one of the first work items for
> the group
----
Hiro Kishimoto

Ian Foster wrote:

The charter doesn't speak to the separation of WS-RenewableReferences into a separate specification, which I think is important.

At 03:04 PM 6/16/2005 +0900, Hiro Kishimoto wrote:

Hi all,

GFSG is now deliberating on WG approval. Attached is the
final charter draft submitted by Andrew.

https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/naming-wg-charter/en/1

Stay tuned.
----
Hiro Kishimoto

Hiro Kishimoto wrote:

Status report:
Progress on both the charter and WSNR (WS Naming resolution).
    RNS moved back to GFS until through document publication, i.e.,
after public comment
    Resolution modification to support base profile use case done and
discussed
    Open issue remains "names" - which are just a string.
Andrew

_______________________________________________________________
Ian Foster                    www.mcs.anl.gov/~foster
Math & Computer Science Div.  Dept of Computer Science
Argonne National Laboratory   The University of Chicago
Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A.     Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A.
Tel: 630 252 4619             Fax: 630 252 1997
        Globus Alliance, www.globus.org