Hi Ellen, The discussion of subclassing in the second paragraph of Sec. 2 is a little unclear to me. Toward the beginning it says "there is no need to define subclasses of the Container class.", but later allows that [the BES container] "may need to be defined as a subclass of the Container class to capture all the needed semantics." Did the first statement really mean something like "there is no need to pre-define subclasses..." or "there is no need to define subclasses...at this time"? [Apologies if this next part is way off base...some time has passed since I wrote the above and I don't have your document at hand at this time.] It seemed to me that the MOF text was not in total agreement with the UML...esp. wrt some of the method return values...? Cheers, BobN ________________________________ From: ogsa-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ogsa-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Ellen Stokes Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:52 PM To: ogsa-wg@ogf.org Subject: [ogsa-wg] container model document for OGSA call Nov 2 Folks, Here's the container model document for the OGSA call Nov 2. https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc13994?nav=1 I suspect most of you won't have time to read it prior to the call, so I'll provide a general overview at the Nov 2 call. The XML section still needs to be written (plan to have for OGSA F2F Nov 9-10). Ellen