Hi Ellen,
The discussion of subclassing in the second paragraph
of Sec. 2 is a little unclear to me. Toward the beginning it says
"there is no need to define subclasses of the Container
class.", but later allows that [the BES container] "may need to be defined as a subclass of the Container class to
capture all the needed semantics."
Did the first statement really mean something like
"there is no need to pre-define subclasses..." or "there is no need to define
subclasses...at this time"?
[Apologies if this next part is way off base...some
time has passed since I wrote the above and I don't have your document at hand
at this time.]
It seemed to me that the MOF text was not in total
agreement with the UML...esp. wrt some of the method return
values...?
Cheers,
BobN
Folks,
Here's the container model document for the OGSA call
Nov 2.
https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc13994?nav=1
I suspect most of you won't have time to
read it prior to the call, so I'll provide a general overview at the Nov 2
call.
The XML section still needs
to be written (plan to have for OGSA F2F Nov 9-10).
Ellen