- ogsa-wg - lists.ogf.org

Proposed agenda for May 22nd call
by Hiro Kishimoto 24 May '06

24 May '06

Hi all, The following is a proposed agenda for OGSA-WG telecon on May 22nd Monday from 5pm to 7pm (CDT). The dial-in number for Monday; US: +1 718 3541071 (New York) or +1 408 9616509 (San Jose) UK: +44 (0)207 3655269 (London) Japan: +81 (0)3 3570 8225 (Tokyo) PIN: 4371991 Screen share service will be provided. URL: http://ogsa.glance.net Session key: 0522 See more explanation: http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/ogsa-wg/2004/06/msg00077.html 1) Early discussion (10 min) Note taker assignment Roll call Telecon minutes approval (if available) GGF17 session minutes approval Action Items status review (see the bottom of this email) Agenda bashing 2) OGSA-WG Summer F2F meeting (20 min) Tentative plan is the week of July 17th in Chicago. Hiro will launch new zoomerang survey shortly. Andreas will setup gcalendar shortly. 3) OGSA telecon schedule (10 min) Hiro will send out telecon schedule proposal. 4) OGSA Information Model (Ellen and Fred, 30 min) Ellen will revise her modeling proposal. You can download current material from here; - Information Modeling in OGSA - Position Paper https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/Info_Model_position_p… - BES Information Model https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/BES_info_model 5) RNS document discussion (Chris Jordan, 20 min) Manual uploaded revised RNS document after GGF17. https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/gfs-wg/document/Resource_Namespace_Ser… Please read this document in advance and ask any questions to Chris and another GFS folks. 6) OGSA glossary document process (Jem and Chris Jordan, 30 min) Jem will explain expected contents and process proposal to new editors (Chris, Dona, and Andrew) 7) Wrap up AOB <*NEXT CALL*> May 25 (Thu): OGSA EMS architecture scenarios (Steven), OGSA authorization call-out proposal review (Frank) <*ACTION ITEMS*> From April 24 call - Frank to write up and send to the list a one page summary of the authorization call-out proposal. From April 5 F2F meeting - Marvin to send e-mail that explains concerns on compliance suite by GGF & EGA. Deferred - Jay check and find out relatively small funding to Globus to develop document on their security work (April 6 F2F) - Hiro to schedule a discussion in the OGSA F2F after the converged specs drafts are released to discuss which sets of specs to use within OGSA. (April 4 F2F) -- Hiro Kishimoto

2 4

Roadmap Editor organization
by Christopher Jordan 23 May '06

23 May '06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I took a first pass over the "activities going forward" list, and it occurs to me that the optimal strategy for the moment would be to try and break these out to specific action items - these can be very high- level actions at first, with increasing levels of refinement as we understand the problems more. I suggest that everyone who intends to participate in the editing process read the current 1.1 draft document and spreadsheet, as well as the "going forward document from Jem Treadwell". All of these are available from: https://forge.gridforum.org/docman2/ViewCategory.php? group_id=42&category_id=945 For example, one of the tasks is to review the tracker items with respect to the current document and decide how we will respond or alter the document based on the trackers. I will take this as an action item. Another is to review and update the status of the various OGSA documents, including newly-added documents-in-progress. This might be a good task for Dona. I can also take the action of reviewing the various text sections and updating them to correspond with the information gathered by Dona, and whoever else works on it. These seem to be the largest and most important tasks, and the ones I felt comfortable taking or assigned. Please review the activities document and let me and Jem Treadwell, at least, know if you are interested in taking on any of the additional items, or if you'd be interested in helping with some of the high-level tasks mentioned above. I'm happy to give regular status reports and have some public discussion on the ogsa-wg e-mail forum, and on the conference calls, but I'd also like to keep most of the editor-specific traffic off the big mailing lists, if possible. We've tentatively chosen Wednesdays at 3PM PDT/6PM EDT as the time for conference calls related to roadmap-editing discussions. I think tomorrow may be too soon to start really having detailed discussions, but if I don't hear from anyone else maybe just Dona and I can speak on the phone for a few. Then let's plan on beginning official calls two weeks from now (Jun 7th), when Dona has returned from vacation, and we will communicate via e-mail in the meantime. Is this ok with everyone? Please note that I'd like to move quickly to assign tasks and begin making progress on this, as it seems that it will be a large, complicated task. If you are seriously committed to participating in the document editing process, please speak and participate soon, as at some point I think we have to close the door to new volunteers, just for the sake of efficiency.. Suggestions, opinions, rebuttals? - ---------------------------------------------------- Chris Jordan HPC Systems Engineer High End Computing Systems Group San Diego Supercomputer Center ctjordan(a)sdsc.edu 858.534.8347 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEc3mZPCVtcXn6kg8RAqy5AJ9uom1PmZwCaaFMJ/dxTOG3wJyzBQCdG/r8 PZD7+fzSxRKk0xDs9fGCCHo= =//bp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Roadmap activities document uploaded
by Treadwell, Jem 23 May '06

23 May '06

Hi, as agreed at yesterday's meeting I have uploaded the Roadmap "next steps" document. The Roadmap 1.1 folder is at: https://forge.gridforum.org/docman2/ViewCategory.php?group_id=42&categor y_id=945 or http://tinyurl.com/aez86 - Jem ________________________________ Jem Treadwell Hewlett-Packard Company 6000 Irwin Road Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 Phone: 856-638-6021 Fax: 856-638-6190 E-mail: Jem.Treadwell(a)hp.com <mailto:Jem.Treadwell@hp.com>

1 0

Teleconference minutes - 22 May 2006
by Andreas Savva 23 May '06

23 May '06

Attached. Gridforge: https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/minutes-20060522/en/1 -- Andreas Savva Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd OGSA Teleconference - 22 May 2005 ================================= * Participants Dona Dickinson (Northrop Grumman) Andrew Grimshaw (UVa) Chris Jordan (SDSC) Hiro Kishimoto (Fujitsu) Fred Maciel (Hitachi) Mark Morgan (UVa) Darren Pulsipher (EMC) Andreas Savva (Fujitsu) Dave Snelling (Fujitsu) Ellen Stokes (IBM) Jem Treadwell (HP) Jay Unger (IBM) Minutes: Andreas Savva * Summary of Actions ACTION: Jay will contact Platform (Chris Smith) and Condor (Miron Livny) to get feedback on pros / cons of the two rendering approaches ACTION: Darren/Andreas will take the Modeling position paper and discuss it within the JSDL-WG as well * May 18 Minutes approved with changes - Delete Dona Dickinson from the participants list. * GGF17 minutes (EMS, Information Model) approved with no changes * Review Action Items: No changes in status * OGSA-WG Summer F2F meeting - July 17 at Chicago (ANL) seems to be the best choice - Strong preference for a 3 1/2 day meeting - Is there an agenda or list of topics identified? Hiro has received a number of requests already and will put together a list. - It is the same week as the DMTF Alliance week. Ellen is trying to arrange for the GGF activities to be at the beginning or end of the week - Marvin Theimer can only make Monday * OGSA telecon schedule Hiro sent out telecon schedule proposal. Identified topics and divided by day making them more convenient to main participants for each topic. Minor changes made for the following US holidays: - May 29 is Memorial Day: no call - July 4 is Independence Day: no call on July 3 and move agenda to July 10 An OGSA-WG google calendar has been setup and is now being tested by a small group. Expect invitations to be sent out to the list in the near future. * OGSA Information Model - Information Modeling in OGSA - Position Paper https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/Info_Model_position_p… - BES Information Model https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/BES_info_model - These are the same versions that were discussed at GGF17. - Fred also requested feedback by email for guideline document. - Andrew has put the table of elements in the BES document (with no rendering). The main issue discussed was the difference between the approach proposed for a (minimal/)general element that can be used to express <name,value> pairs, with the value part being typeless VS extension using an xsd:any and defining a schema. - (See also minutes of GGF17 and April 27.) - There has been experience with both approaches - Difference is relying on explicit typing vs convention; and checking types when validating vs matching time (fail in a subtle fashion) - Discussed whether stronger typing with a schema makes for easier checking. Having an xsd:any doesn't help as much as people might think for checking types; matching might still fail later. - It is still necessary to define conventions. Need to define a set of <name,value> conventions - Andrew's issue is whether the value (in (<name,value>) is typed. - Type checking information is needed somewhere; and wouldn't want to have it only in the code Jay's proposal: 1. minimal; or 2. minimal approach + type checking for base types (e.g., int, float, boolean etc) Agreed to seek the opinions of people who have done work with these approaches on the pros and cons of each approach: - schema/typed: EGEE, Glite - minimal/convention: Condor, LSF ACTION: Jay will contact Platform (Chris Smith) and Condor (Miron Livny) to get feedback on pros / cons of the two rendering approaches ACTION: Darren/Andreas will take the Modeling position paper and discuss it within the JSDL-WG as well * RNS document discussion A revised, simplified, draft was uploaded before GGF17 by Manuel Pereira. It was discussed at GGF17. The purpose of this review was to confirm whether this new draft meets the requirements of other stakeholders and whether it can be submitted to the GGF Editor. There were some comments and requests for clarifications and minor changes but overall it was agreed that this is a good draft and that it meets stakeholders requirements for simplicity and extensibility. Chris Jordan will incorporate the feedback into a new draft, to be ready sometime next week. * OGSA Roadmap document process Jem went through a list of work items (to be uploaded to gridforge) - Main job is updating document set, dependencies and milestones for the document. So a lot of the work is identifying people that will contribute data. - The current infrastructure (excel sheet & pasting) needs a lot of manual work. It works but a better (more automatic) approach might be nice. Hiro thanked all the people volunteering. He explained that the GGF Editor has placed limits on how many names (authors/editors) may appear on the front page. Current rule is not more than three with other people contributing to the work being identified in a separate section. - Dona said she would be happy to contribute to this work in any capacity. - It was agreed that Chris Jordan will replace Jem as the main editor of the Roadmap since he has been involved in OGSA-WG longer than the other volunteers.

1 0

Summer interim F2F meeting survay
by Hiro Kishimoto 22 May '06

22 May '06

Hi all, At this Thursday call, I took an action item to lunch a Zoomerang survey for asking members' availability for Summer F2F meeting. Please take a time to answer questions *ASAP* (at latest May 24 Wednesday): http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?p=WEB225BX9NE7XS We will review and decide date/location next week. Thanks, -- Hiro Kishimoto Minutes from May 18 call. > Discussed possible dates for summer F2F. > - End of june, before of after HPDC in Europe is one possibility > that was rejected in the past. > - First option: Week of July 17 at Chicago > - Possible for most people on the call > - (Donal cannot make July at all) > - Hiro/Jay to ask Ian Foster and Steve Tuecke whether they can > attend. > - Chosing Chicago in order to get more Globus participation. Chris > Jordan will also ask his Globus contacts if they can > participate. > - Tried to determine a second option in August but there was no > consensus. Many people plan to be on holiday. > > Actions: > - Hiro to do the usual Zoomerang > - Andreas to set up a Google calendar

1 2

GGF17 Resource Management (Information Model) session minutes
by Fred Maciel 20 May '06

20 May '06

Hi, I just uploaded the minutes: https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/GGF17-OGSA-RM-minu tes/en Regards, Fred Maciel Hitachi America R&D The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in Hitachi America, Ltd. on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and is unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this e-mail and then delete it from your system. Hitachi America, Ltd. is not liable for any improper and/or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication or for any delay in its receipt. Hitachi America, Ltd. is not responsible for any damage caused by malicious code or alteration by any third party. The contents of this e-mail do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Hitachi America, Ltd.

1 0

[ogsa-wg | Roadmap 1.1 - 1822] gap analysis
by Sourceforge Tracker Monitor 20 May '06

20 May '06

A new artifact has been added: 1822 Submitted by: Hiro Kishimoto Submitted date: 2006-05-20 09:50:39 Respond by visiting: https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=815&aid=1822&group_id… (https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=815&aid=1822&group_id…) Summary: gap analysis Project: Open Grid Services Architecture Tracker: Roadmap 1.1 Artifact ID: 1822 Category: <None> Group: <None> Status: Open Priority: 3 Last Modified By: Hiro Kishimoto Last Modified: 2006-05-20 09:50:39 Submitted By: Hiro Kishimoto Submit Date: 2006-05-20 09:50:39 Assigned To: Hiro Kishimoto File(s): <None> Description: It is recommended to add "gap analysis" to the roadmap document. For example, each OGSA capability has overview section and lists up major services and documents. If such services or documents are already taken care of any WGs, just refers to corresponding section. If not, this is a "gap" and encourage readers to fulfill such gaps. View the Roadmap 1.1 : https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?func=browse&group_id=42&atid=… (https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?func=browse&group_id=42&atid=…)

1 0

Naming Document
by Mark Morgan 19 May '06

19 May '06

A new version of the WS-Naming document has been uploaded to grid forge. This document incorporates changes which reflect discussions, both at GGF in Tokyo and on recent Naming telecons, that unify naming with the Web Services Endpoint Identification and Resolution Use Case informational document provided by David Snelling and Frank Siebenlist. Please check the new document out and comment as desired. -Mark

1 0

Teleconference minutes - 18 May 2006
by Andreas Savva 19 May '06

19 May '06

Minutes attached. https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/minutes-20060518/en/1 -- Andreas Savva Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd OGSA Teleconference - 18 May 2006 ================================= * Participants Mike Behrens (R2AD, LLC) Dona Dickinson (Northrop Grumman) Donal Fellows (UoM) Chris Jordan (SDSC) Hiro Kishimoto (Fujitsu) Tom Maguire (EMC) Andreas Savva (Fujitsu) David Snelling (Fujitsu) Ellen Stokes (IBM) Jem Treadwell (HP) Jay Unger (IBM) Minutes: Andreas Savva * April 27 Minutes - approved with no changes * Action item review (Only items with updates are listed below.) - Ellen will do an example of a cluster (e.g., the glue cluster model) and the 'red' to 'blue' mapping for it - Similar example produced as part of GGF17 document produced by Ellen. - (CLOSED) - Hiro and Jun will look at what needs to be provided as a set of common component models and make a proposal to the group. - Hiro and Jun produced some initial material which they presented at GGF. They will continue refining them and will review in future calls. - (CLOSED) - Manuel & Andrew to determine where/when to hold standard hierarchical namespaces discussions. - Chris Jordan gave a status update: A revised draft was produced by GFS-WG before GGF17. It was reviewed at GGF17. - Will give some time to OGSA-Naming-WG and OGSA-Data-WG to review and comment and if agreement is reached to submit to GGF Editor - Agreed to review document on next OGSA call (next Monday) - There is a need to check Andrew's and Manuel's availability - (CLOSED) - Steven Newhouse to ask Jennifer Schopf on the status of the GIN modeling document. - Obsolete. - (CLOSED) * GGF17 review - Postponed minutes approval: the Information Model minutes have not been uploaded yet and many people have not had a chance to read the EMS minutes yet. ** OGSA & Alternative Architectures session - Andreas has asked the panel organizer to upload the slides. One idea is to treat them as public comments to OGSA 1.5. - Clarified that OGSA-WG still has to get separate permission to do so. - It was an interesting panel. It was good to hear the opinions of people not directly involved in OGSA. - Despite the title there was really no discussion of an alternative architecture. It would be interesting to actually talk about alternatives that are not just 'plain web services'. - OGSA also seems to have more potential support within GGF. Dave Snelling will explore this more. * Roadmap 1.1 Jem cannot take on new work at this time though he will continue to be involved in the WG. A call for volunteers for Roadmap editor resulted in three people volunteering to help out. - Agreed to make a final choice next call (Monday) - Once a selection is made there should be a discussion on what needs to be done, how to hand over work, and how to start working on the document. - Agreed on having a separate call between current and next editors to hand over work and assign responsibilites. Jem has a list of things that should be done for the next version and he will share it with the next editor. For example, what is the relation with the GGF live-charter (is design team output properly represented on the live-charter; the live-charter does not have dependencies recorded---too complex; and so on.) Hiro said that a Gap analysis section might be a good addition to the Roadmap document. * OGSA & Glossary 1.5 - Public comment period ended May 9 with no comments. Since then Jem has uploaded some comments from Olegario; and Andreas has put a comment about the 'Alternative Architectures' panel--but still need permission of presenters to use their slides as comments. - Put the Glossary again on next Monday's call, if agenda allows. - Agreed to ask particular people to review and comment: - Ian Foster (Andreas to ask) - Jeff Frey (Jay to ask) - Marvin Theimer (Hiro to ask) * OGSA Security Profiles They are in public comment. There is one comment from Marty Humphrey so far. * Webcast Jem has received feedback and will forward it out to the OGSA list * F2F Planning Discussed using Google Calendar to manage OGSA-WG schedule and planning for F2F. - Andreas will create an OGSA-WG calendar by Monday. Seed it with some known events - Set it up to send calendar invitations to the ogsa-wg list (so needs to have a gmail account) to make it easy for people to register events in the private calendars. - Allow people to subscribe to it (and publish to it). Also support a completely public view not requiring having a google account. Discussed possible dates for summer F2F. - End of june, before of after HPDC in Europe is one possibility that was rejected in the past. - First option: Week of July 17 at Chicago - Possible for most people on the call - (Donal cannot make July at all) - Hiro/Jay to ask Ian Foster and Steve Tuecke whether they can attend. - Chosing Chicago in order to get more Globus participation. Chris Jordan will also ask his Globus contacts if they can participate. - Tried to determine a second option in August but there was no consensus. Many people plan to be on holiday. Actions: - Hiro to do the usual Zoomerang - Andreas to set up a Google calendar * OASIS SDD TC report Hiro reported on the SDD F2F: - The minutes and related materials are available from the SDD TC site (see also Hiro's email on the list). - Identified and discussed overlap with ACS, CDL, and partly with OGSA EMS, JSDL. - SDD TC decided to base their specification on the IBM/Macrovision submission - IUDD V2. And this is a lot different from the GGF specs. - They did agree to converge this spec with the ACS specification. This effort looks like 'low-hanging fruit'. - They are interested in the resource requirements in JSDL and the information model work done in OGSA-WG. - There are considerable problems with CDDLM stemming from different models (e.g., different lifecycle model) - They are interested in some parts of CDL and may borrow ideas but SDD V1 is likely to be very different. - It is a good sign that they are interested in working with us on converging the various specifications. One unclear issue from Hiro's explanation is the extent to which the SDD (IUDD) spec will try to duplicate existing descriptions. (Is it a 'collector' of existing descriptions or does it duplicate and replace existing descriptors?) - Some degree of 'denormalization' (information existing in the native package also appearing in the /canonicalized meta-data description/ in SDD) is not a problem. But if the intention is to replace all existing deployers/installers they are likely to run into a host of other (political) problems. - Since it is unlikely to have a single deployment descriptor there is a need to make sure that kind of thinking is incorporated.

1 0

FW: Evaluation of the Grid webcast
by Treadwell, Jem 18 May '06

18 May '06

Hi, below is the feedback we received from a follow-up survey of webcast participants. The next-to-last question was a "check all that apply" question, so I think the 30 responses really means that the 14 respondents checked a total of 30 boxes. Note that the "future topics" question at the end includes requests for more info from OGSA and from other working groups. - Jem > The session had 138 registrants and 61 classroom attendees. > > Attendees included one or more representatives from the following > businesses and universtities: AAA Computing, ACET Centre University > of Reading, Acxiom, Anydata Limited, Aricie, AT&T, BAE, CA, CERN, > Choreology Ltd, Cisco, commerx, COS, CS a.s.,CUC, DCT, Dell. Deloitte, > Deutscher Wetterdienst, Digital Enterprise Research Institute, Digital > Impact, FGAN, Fujitsu Siemens Computers, FZK, Gatech, Georgia State > University, GGF, GPPD-UFRGS, Gridcore AB, Gridguru, GSI, Hitachi Data > Systems, HPI University of Potsdam, Huawei Tech, IBM, Illinois > Institute of Technology, Imperial, INAF, Iowa State University, KISTI, > KTH, Lemko, Lund University, MAC Holdings (Pvt) Ltd., Mississippi > State University, Nagoya Institute of Technology, National University > of Defense Technology, NCHC, NCR, Network Appliance Inc., NICTA, > Northrop Grumman, NUST Institute of IT, Oak Ridge National Lab, OCL > USA Inc, Oklahoma State University, Oracle, OSU Stillwater, Otago > Polytechnic, Platform Computing, R2AD, Rochester Institute of > Technology, SAS Institute, School of EEE Nanyang Technological > University, SDSC, SGT, SJTU, Softbank BB Corp., Software Perspectives, > Sony Computer Entertainment, Soongsil University, Source Media, Sun > Microsystems Inc., SURA, SURA, Swiss Inst. of Bioinformatics, Synnex > Corp., Tabor Communications, TACC, Telcordia Technologies, The George > Washington University, TNO I&T, TU Delft, TUM, UCSF, University of > Amsterdam, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences > Center, University of Hamburg, University of Michigan, University of > Naples, University of Reading, University of Southampton, Vision > Solutions Inc., Wireless Grids Co., Xyratex, Zhejiang University, Zuse > Institute Berlin. > > The playback is posted at: > http://www.presentationselect.com/HPinvent/archive.asp?eventid=1188 > > Results of the polls were as follows: > > Question Total > Responses Responses Number % of Total > How familiar are you with OGSA? (choose one) 33 Very familiar > 5 15% > Somewhat familiar 10 30% > Limited knowledge 13 39% > No knowledge 5 15% > > What drives your interest in OGSA? (choose one) 32 > Application manager, architect or developer 19 59% > Grid software developer or provider 18 56% > Active member of GGF 8 25% > Member of standards dev't organization other than GGF > 4 12% > Student 5 15% > Press/analyst 0 0% > > > Results of the evaluation were as follows: > > Question Total > Responses Responses Number % of Total > The webcast was very informative 14 Strongly agree 7 > 50% > Agree 6 42.9% > Neutral 1 7.1% > Disagree 0 0.0% > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > > The webcast provided me with content that I will be able to use in my > work 14 Strongly agree 2 14.3% > Agree 8 57.1% > Neutral 4 28.6% > Disagree 0 0.0% > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > > Attending the webcast was a valuable use of my time 14 Strongly > agree 5 35.7% > Agree 8 57.1% > Neutral 1 7.1% > Disagree 0 0.0% > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > > I would recommend the Invent Online series to my colleagues 14 > Strongly agree 6 42.9% > Agree 8 57.1% > Neutral 0 0.0% > Disagree 0 0.0% > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > > Based either on what you learned in this broadcast or what you already > knew about OGSA: do you think that OGSA technical direction will > establish architecture and specifications that will help your > organization and others to build real grids? (choose one) 14 > Strongly agree 5 35.7% > Somewhat agree 6 42.9% > Neither agree nor disagree 1 7.1% > Somewhat disagree 0 0.0% > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > Don't know enough 2 14.3% > > Do you think that OGSA effectively blends the technical requirements > and use cases of eScience and eBusiness grids? (choose one) 14 > Strongly agree 3 21.4% > Somewhat agree 6 42.9% > Neither agree nor disagree 3 21.4% > Somewhat disagree 0 0.0 > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > Don't know enough 2 > > What effects do you think the "open" process that GGF and OGSA follows > has on the definition of architecture and specifications (choose all > that apply 30 Delays or lengthens the process of > standardization too much 0 0.0% > Produces architecture and specifications that do not > provide sufficient detail for realistic implementations 1 > 3.3% > Depends too much on other standards or the work of other > standard bodies 3 10.0% > Produces architecture and specifications that > successfully incorporate the grid community's ideas and requirements > 9 30.0% > Produces specifications that will eventually be adopted > and complied with by most grid software developers 8 26.7% > Produces specifications and architecture that will > promote the interoperability and integration of grid software > components from multiple sources 9 30.0% > > What topics would you like to have discussed in future webcasts > * virtualization survey, comparing technologies single sign-on > security - implications for apps and customers. > * comparison of ETL tools > * More technical information on OGSA. > * Grid Computing Scientific/Business Workflow systems] > * Interview of the following GGF workgroups : -DAIS-WG; -DFDL-WG; > > >

1 0