The current proposal looks fine. On the back-off time, I am inclined to make this an implementation detail, i.e. we may mention it in the text but otherwise do not standardise on it. People may consider passing it in as an extension, if we allow for that in the TrensferRequirements element. Cheers, Michel On 18 Dec 2007, at 19:57, Ravi Madduri wrote:
I am all for it. On Dec 18, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Steven Newhouse wrote:
Only one thought on reading it… do we need a parameter to control a back-off time between retries? After a failure wait X seconds before retrying? Should the interval increase (i.e. double) with each attempt.
Just a suggestion… otherwise it looks good.
Steven
From: ogsa-dmi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ogsa-dmi-wg- bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Ravi Madduri Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:48 AM To: Ravi Madduri Cc: ogsa-dmi-wg@ogf.org Subject: Re: [ogsa-dmi-wg] Retries Proposal
Hi Please find attached my retries proposal with mario's comments and some corrections from my side ( in response to Mario's corrections ). Please comment
Thanks
-- Ravi K Madduri The Globus Alliance | Argonne National Laboratory | University of Chicago http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/~madduri
-- ogsa-dmi-wg mailing list ogsa-dmi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-dmi-wg