The current proposal looks fine.

On the back-off time, I am inclined to make this an implementation detail, i.e. we may mention it in the text but otherwise do not standardise on it. People may consider passing it in as an extension, if we allow for that in the TrensferRequirements element.

Cheers,
Michel

On 18 Dec 2007, at 19:57, Ravi Madduri wrote:

I am all for it. 
On Dec 18, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Steven Newhouse wrote:

Only one thought on reading it… do we need a parameter to control a back-off time between retries? After a failure wait X seconds before retrying? Should the interval increase (i.e. double) with each attempt.
 
Just a suggestion… otherwise it looks good.
 
Steven
 
From: ogsa-dmi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ogsa-dmi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Ravi Madduri
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:48 AM
To: Ravi Madduri
Cc: ogsa-dmi-wg@ogf.org
Subject: Re: [ogsa-dmi-wg] Retries Proposal
 
Hi
Please find attached my retries proposal with mario's comments and some corrections from my side ( in response to Mario's corrections ). Please comment
 
Thanks
 

--
Ravi K Madduri
The Globus Alliance | Argonne National Laboratory | University of Chicago

--
  ogsa-dmi-wg mailing list
  ogsa-dmi-wg@ogf.org
  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-dmi-wg