Thanks... Ancillary: 0 Computer : 2 Storage : 0 ============== Total : 1 Kristoffer Sheather wrote:

+1 compute then storage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From*: Gary Mazz <garymazzaferro@gmail.com> *Sent*: Thursday, 11 June 2009 7:04 AM *To*: "Krishna Sankar (ksankar)" <ksankar@cisco.com> *Subject*: Re: [occi-wg] What next on the apis ?

Thanks...

Ancillary: 0 Computer : 1 Storage : 0 ============== Total : 1

Krishna Sankar (ksankar) wrote:

...

IMHO, compute might be the next step and then storage. Cheers

|-----Original Message----- |From: occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf |Of Gary Mazz |Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:24 PM |To: Edmonds, AndrewX; occi-wg@ogf.org |Subject: [occi-wg] What next next on the apis ? | |Hi | |Since there's been so much feedback on the cloud model/responsibilities |and the network attributes matrix, I was thinking about the next |analysis. should it be storage, cpu/mem. or ancillary ? | |-gary |_______________________________________________ |occi-wg mailing list |occi-wg@ogf.org |http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg

_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg