+1 compute then storage.
From: Gary Mazz <garymazzaferro@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, 11 June 2009 7:04 AM
To: "Krishna Sankar (ksankar)" <ksankar@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [occi-wg] What next on the apis ?
Thanks...
Ancillary: 0
Computer : 1
Storage : 0
==============
Total : 1
Krishna Sankar (ksankar) wrote:
> IMHO, compute might be the next step and then storage.
> Cheers
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On
> Behalf
> |Of Gary Mazz
> |Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:24 PM
> |To: Edmonds, AndrewX; occi-wg@ogf.org
> |Subject: [occi-wg] What next next on the apis ?
> |
> |Hi
> |
> |Since there's been so much feedback on the cloud model/responsibilities
> |and the network attributes matrix, I was thinking about the next
> |analysis. should it be storage, cpu/mem. or ancillary ?
> |
> |-gary
> |_______________________________________________
> |occi-wg mailing list
> |occi-wg@ogf.org
> |http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
>
_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg