Jaime is right - Action is in line with the spec's nomenclature. Also you might remove "Ruby GEMS" - that's just a packaging system used by ruby. Andy andy.edmonds.be On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 08:33, Alan Sill <alan.sill@ttu.edu> wrote:
Hi Jamie,
Quite possibly.
Group, what are your thoughts? I am on a plane to the location of the workshop shortly, so please gather and send any other corrections to Joel. (He will be traveling soon too, but I think there is time to incorporate correction suggestions.)
Alan
On Nov 1, 2011, at 3:12 AM, Jamie Marshall wrote:
Hello Alain,
I agree it looks better with the lighter font. In the central diagram it mentions "Operation", I was wondering if the official OCCI model term of "Action" would be more approriate ?
Sincerely Jamie Marshall Expertise Manager Prologue Accords, Cords, Comons Architect Compatible One
From: alan.sill@ttu.edu Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 03:04:37 -0500 To: occi-wg@ogf.org CC: replogle@ogf.org; Craig.A.Lee@aero.org; alan.sill@ttu.edu Subject: Re: [occi-wg] OCCI flyer for NIST and SC11
This one has slightly better layout and a lighter body font.
On Nov 1, 2011, at 2:40 AM, Sill, Alan wrote:
Attached is a flyer describing OCCI for use at the NIST workshop. Those who are going to SuperComputing may wish to put this out, along with others that we plan to make, for distribution at their booths or otherwise make use of it.
Please review it and pass on any comments ASAP.
Thanks, Alan
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg