Andy
andy.edmonds.be

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 08:33, Alan Sill <alan.sill@ttu.edu> wrote:

Hi Jamie,

Quite possibly.

Group, what are your thoughts? I am on a plane to the location of the workshop shortly, so please gather and send any other corrections to Joel. (He will be traveling soon too, but I think there is time to incorporate correction suggestions.)

Alan

On Nov 1, 2011, at 3:12 AM, Jamie Marshall wrote:

> Hello Alain,
>
> I agree it looks better with the lighter font.
> In the central diagram it mentions "Operation", I was wondering if the official OCCI model term of "Action" would be more approriate ?
>
> Sincerely
> Jamie Marshall
> Expertise Manager
> Prologue
> Accords, Cords, Comons Architect
> Compatible One
>
>
> From: alan.sill@ttu.edu
> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 03:04:37 -0500
> To: occi-wg@ogf.org
> CC: replogle@ogf.org; Craig.A.Lee@aero.org; alan.sill@ttu.edu
> Subject: Re: [occi-wg] OCCI flyer for NIST and SC11
>
> This one has slightly better layout and a lighter body font.
>
> On Nov 1, 2011, at 2:40 AM, Sill, Alan wrote:
>
> > Attached is a flyer describing OCCI for use at the NIST workshop. Those who are going to SuperComputing may wish to put this out, along with others that we plan to make, for distribution at their booths or otherwise make use of it.
> >
> > Please review it and pass on any comments ASAP.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alan
>
>
> _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg

_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg