On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Gary Mazz <garymazzaferro@gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed.... ANd plugfests are a good way to help identify those extensions.
Exactly. If OCCI gets anything more than modest adoption (it certainly should provided we deliver on time) then we probably won't even have to organise these ourselves... organisations like the Open Cloud Consortium sound more geared up for this kind of thing anyway. OTOH sounds like a useful addition to the OGF27/28 agenda. Sam
Randy Bias wrote:
Yes. Extensions do not need to be interoperable. If it becomes clear that a given extension *does* need to be interoperable (e.g. widely adopted or lots of variations of the same theme) then that’s a red flag indicating we need to evaluate it for inclusion in the core.
On 5/14/09 12:42 PM, "Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> wrote:
Whoever said extensions need to be interoperable? We can do what we can (e.g. registries) but beyond that extensions are just somewhere for people to put stuff, like trunk space.
-- Randy Bias, VP Technology Strategy, GoGrid randyb@gogrid.com, (415) 939-8507 [mobile] BLOG: http://neotactics.com/blog, TWITTER: twitter.com/randybias ------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg