Agreed.... ANd plugfests are a good way to help identify those extensions.

Exactly. If OCCI gets anything more than modest adoption (it certainly should provided we deliver on time) then we probably won't even have to organise these ourselves... organisations like the Open Cloud Consortium sound more geared up for this kind of thing anyway.

OTOH sounds like a useful addition to the OGF27/28 agenda.

Sam

Randy Bias wrote:
> Yes. Extensions do not need to be interoperable. If it becomes clear
> that a given extension *does* need to be interoperable (e.g. widely
> adopted or lots of variations of the same theme) then that’s a red
> flag indicating we need to evaluate it for inclusion in the core.
>
>
> On 5/14/09 12:42 PM, "Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> wrote:
>
> Whoever said extensions need to be interoperable? We can do what
> we can (e.g. registries) but beyond that extensions are just
> somewhere for people to put stuff, like trunk space.
>
>
>
> --
> Randy Bias, VP Technology Strategy, GoGrid
> randyb@gogrid.com, (415) 939-8507 [mobile]
> BLOG: http://neotactics.com/blog, TWITTER: twitter.com/randybias

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg@ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>

_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg