Hello All, Thanks to Richard for his second review of the NSI AA document (as well as the review from Jens). We will address the outstanding issues on today’s NSI call. The marked up AA doc is available here: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13424 Comments by Richard: Most of the comments dealt with in a clear manner. Only two points remain: 1. How does the OE know the path and hence the Auth servers in advance of path computation? The assumption from John: “It is my assumption that a user community like LHCONE would use one authorization system and anyone using, or providing resource as part of, would use the same system.” May be valid but it really limits the general use of the standard. Somewhere in maybe section 7, or the intro, you need to have some lines outlining limitation/assumption and stating that the general case if for future study. 2. OAuth section seems to introduce new terminology. Guy Guy Roberts PhD Senior Transport Network Architect Tel: +44 (0)1223 371316 Mob: +44 (0)7881 336417 Skype: guy1965 GÉANT Networks • Services • People Learn more at www.geant.org<http://www.geant.org/> GEANT Limited, trading as GÉANT. Registered in England & Wales. Registration Number 2806796. Registered Office – City House, 126-130 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1PQ
Hi all, Both John and I made a pass to address all the outstanding comments. We believe this is ready for final review and public comment if the clarification to the comments are satisfactory. The updated document can be found on Redmine: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13536 Thanks! - Chin Chin Guok NOC: (510) 486-7600 Network Engineer (800) 333-7638 ESnet Network Engineering Group (AS293) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Guy Roberts <Guy.Roberts@geant.org> wrote:
Hello All,
Thanks to Richard for his second review of the NSI AA document (as well as the review from Jens). We will address the outstanding issues on today’s NSI call.
The marked up AA doc is available here:
https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13424
Comments by Richard:
Most of the comments dealt with in a clear manner.
Only two points remain:
1. How does the OE know the path and hence the Auth servers in advance of path computation?
The assumption from John:
“It is my assumption that a user community like LHCONE would use one authorization system and anyone using, or providing resource as part of, would use the same system.” May be valid but it really limits the general use of the standard.
Somewhere in maybe section 7, or the intro, you need to have some lines outlining limitation/assumption and stating that the general case if for future study.
2. OAuth section seems to introduce new terminology.
Guy
*Guy Roberts PhD*
*Senior Transport Network Architect*
Tel: +44 (0)1223 371316
Mob: +44 (0)7881 336417
Skype: guy1965
*GÉANT*
Networks • Services • People
Learn more at www.geant.org
GEANT Limited, trading as GÉANT. Registered in England & Wales. Registration Number 2806796. Registered Office – City House, 126-130 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1PQ
_______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
Hello All Thanks Chin and John for this. I have cleaned this up, i.e. removed comments and updated fields and dates. This is now v7 and is available here for upload for public comment: https://redmine.ogf.org/issues/284 Guy From: Chin Guok [mailto:chin@es.net] Sent: 02 July 2016 17:41 To: Guy Roberts Cc: nsi-wg@ogf.org; Greg Newby (newby@arsc.edu); Jens Jensen; Richard Hughes-Jones; Alan Sill (alan.sill@ttu.edu) Subject: Re: [Nsi-wg] NSI AA document ready to go to public comment Hi all, Both John and I made a pass to address all the outstanding comments. We believe this is ready for final review and public comment if the clarification to the comments are satisfactory. The updated document can be found on Redmine: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13536 Thanks! - Chin Chin Guok NOC: (510) 486-7600 Network Engineer (800) 333-7638 ESnet Network Engineering Group (AS293) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Guy Roberts <Guy.Roberts@geant.org<mailto:Guy.Roberts@geant.org>> wrote: Hello All, Thanks to Richard for his second review of the NSI AA document (as well as the review from Jens). We will address the outstanding issues on today’s NSI call. The marked up AA doc is available here: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13424 Comments by Richard: Most of the comments dealt with in a clear manner. Only two points remain: 1. How does the OE know the path and hence the Auth servers in advance of path computation? The assumption from John: “It is my assumption that a user community like LHCONE would use one authorization system and anyone using, or providing resource as part of, would use the same system.” May be valid but it really limits the general use of the standard. Somewhere in maybe section 7, or the intro, you need to have some lines outlining limitation/assumption and stating that the general case if for future study. 2. OAuth section seems to introduce new terminology. Guy Guy Roberts PhD Senior Transport Network Architect Tel: +44 (0)1223 371316<tel:%2B44%20%280%291223%20371316> Mob: +44 (0)7881 336417<tel:%2B44%20%280%297881%20336417> Skype: guy1965 GÉANT Networks • Services • People Learn more at www.geant.org<http://www.geant.org/> GEANT Limited, trading as GÉANT. Registered in England & Wales. Registration Number 2806796. Registered Office – City House, 126-130 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1PQ _______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org<mailto:nsi-wg@ogf.org> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
Hi all, In my environment, I can see some garbage characters in Fig 1 and Fig 4 as I attached. They seem to include local characters. Could you check on them? Thanks! Atsuko Atsuko Takefusa, Ph. D. National Institute of Informatics
2016/07/04 18:49、Guy Roberts <Guy.Roberts@geant.org> のメール：
Hello All
Thanks Chin and John for this. I have cleaned this up, i.e. removed comments and updated fields and dates.
This is now v7 and is available here for upload for public comment:https://redmine.ogf.org/issues/284
Guy
From: Chin Guok [mailto:chin@es.net] Sent: 02 July 2016 17:41 To: Guy Roberts Cc: nsi-wg@ogf.org; Greg Newby (newby@arsc.edu); Jens Jensen; Richard Hughes-Jones; Alan Sill (alan.sill@ttu.edu) Subject: Re: [Nsi-wg] NSI AA document ready to go to public comment
Hi all,
Both John and I made a pass to address all the outstanding comments. We believe this is ready for final review and public comment if the clarification to the comments are satisfactory.
The updated document can be found on Redmine: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13536
Thanks!
- Chin
Chin Guok NOC: (510) 486-7600 Network Engineer (800) 333-7638 ESnet Network Engineering Group (AS293) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Guy Roberts <Guy.Roberts@geant.org> wrote: Hello All,
Thanks to Richard for his second review of the NSI AA document (as well as the review from Jens). We will address the outstanding issues on today’s NSI call.
The marked up AA doc is available here: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13424
Comments by Richard: Most of the comments dealt with in a clear manner.
Only two points remain:
1. How does the OE know the path and hence the Auth servers in advance of path computation?
The assumption from John:
“It is my assumption that a user community like LHCONE would use one authorization system and anyone using, or providing resource as part of, would use the same system.” May be valid but it really limits the general use of the standard.
Somewhere in maybe section 7, or the intro, you need to have some lines outlining limitation/assumption and stating that the general case if for future study.
2. OAuth section seems to introduce new terminology.
Guy
Guy Roberts PhD Senior Transport Network Architect Tel: +44 (0)1223 371316 Mob: +44 (0)7881 336417 Skype: guy1965
GÉANT Networks • Services • People Learn more at www.geant.org GEANT Limited, trading as GÉANT. Registered in England & Wales. Registration Number 2806796. Registered Office – City House, 126-130 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1PQ
_______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
_______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
Hello Takefusa-san, Thanks for spotting this problem. I have corrected the problem here: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13424?download=21640 I will add this correction to the published version. Regards, Guy From: Atsuko Takefusa [mailto:takefusa@nii.ac.jp] Sent: 08 July 2016 03:13 To: Guy Roberts Cc: Chin Guok; Greg Newby (newby@arsc.edu); Jens Jensen; Richard Hughes-Jones; nsi-wg@ogf.org; Alan Sill (alan.sill@ttu.edu) Subject: Re: [Nsi-wg] NSI AA document ready to go to public comment Hi all, In my environment, I can see some garbage characters in Fig 1 and Fig 4 as I attached. They seem to include local characters. Could you check on them? Thanks! Atsuko Atsuko Takefusa, Ph. D. National Institute of Informatics [cid:image001.png@01D1E66F.B2C617A0][cid:image002.png@01D1E66F.B2C617A0] 2016/07/04 18:49、Guy Roberts <Guy.Roberts@geant.org<mailto:Guy.Roberts@geant.org>> のメール： Hello All Thanks Chin and John for this. I have cleaned this up, i.e. removed comments and updated fields and dates. This is now v7 and is available here for upload for public comment:https://redmine.ogf.org/issues/284 Guy From: Chin Guok [mailto:chin@es.net] Sent: 02 July 2016 17:41 To: Guy Roberts Cc: nsi-wg@ogf.org<mailto:nsi-wg@ogf.org>; Greg Newby (newby@arsc.edu<mailto:newby@arsc.edu>); Jens Jensen; Richard Hughes-Jones; Alan Sill (alan.sill@ttu.edu<mailto:alan.sill@ttu.edu>) Subject: Re: [Nsi-wg] NSI AA document ready to go to public comment Hi all, Both John and I made a pass to address all the outstanding comments. We believe this is ready for final review and public comment if the clarification to the comments are satisfactory. The updated document can be found on Redmine: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13536 Thanks! - Chin Chin Guok NOC: (510) 486-7600 Network Engineer (800) 333-7638 ESnet Network Engineering Group (AS293) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Guy Roberts <Guy.Roberts@geant.org<mailto:Guy.Roberts@geant.org>> wrote: Hello All, Thanks to Richard for his second review of the NSI AA document (as well as the review from Jens). We will address the outstanding issues on today’s NSI call. The marked up AA doc is available here: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13424 Comments by Richard: Most of the comments dealt with in a clear manner. Only two points remain: 1. How does the OE know the path and hence the Auth servers in advance of path computation? The assumption from John: “It is my assumption that a user community like LHCONE would use one authorization system and anyone using, or providing resource as part of, would use the same system.” May be valid but it really limits the general use of the standard. Somewhere in maybe section 7, or the intro, you need to have some lines outlining limitation/assumption and stating that the general case if for future study. 2. OAuth section seems to introduce new terminology. Guy Guy Roberts PhD Senior Transport Network Architect Tel: +44 (0)1223 371316 Mob: +44 (0)7881 336417 Skype: guy1965 GÉANT Networks • Services • People Learn more at www.geant.org<http://www.geant.org> GEANT Limited, trading as GÉANT. Registered in England & Wales. Registration Number 2806796. Registered Office – City House, 126-130 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1PQ _______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org<mailto:nsi-wg@ogf.org> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg _______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org<mailto:nsi-wg@ogf.org> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
participants (4)
-
Atsuko Takefusa -
Chin Guok -
Guy Roberts -
Guy Roberts