Do we use WSDL of Rio version or SC version?

Same as previous e-mail. I would really like to use the new SC version to reduce the impact leading up to SC. This will force us to work through the WSDL issues (should be none) this next week. John. On 2011-10-18, at 7:05 AM, Takahiro Miyamoto wrote:

Hi Jerry,

csProviderEndpoint of KDDI labs is correct.

And I have a question. Do we use WSDL of Rio version or SC version? G-lambda/KDDILabs is not changed yet.

Best regards, Takahiro

On 2011/10/18 19:49, Jerry Sobieski wrote:

...

Hi all-

Attached is topo .owl file v1.1.

The corrections were many, but almost all were mistakes I had missed in the initial pass.

- Changed "Pioneer" to "Pionier" - corrected several scProvider Endpoints - Corrected several STP references that were missing or incorrect. - Re-engineered JGN-X: JGNX is removed from the demo topology and AIST and KDDI Labs peer directly now with StarLight. (THis was due to no NSI version of OSCARS will be available at JGNX) Note: after this re-config, there are now only two SDPs linking StarLight & AIST (1780 & 1781), and likewise only two linking KDDI and StarLight (1782 & 1783).

Everyone: Please! If you have not confirmed your csProviderEndpoint with me, please do so. THese are critical to the whole mechanism, and the only soap endpoints I have are the ones we used for Rio...need to make sure these are still correct.

Note: there will be more changes, but the key topology elements are settling down now. The attached PPT reflects the basic demo topology and a slide about StarLight (for the StarLight engineers)

Thanks. Questions/corrections to me. Jerry

_______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg

-- Takahiro Miyamoto <tk-miyamoto@kddilabs.jp> KDDI R&D Laboratories, Inc. TEL: +81-49-278-7455 / FAX: +81-49-278-7811 _______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg

I hope the SC version because I have already upgraded and committed the code. Shouldn't take you more than a couple of hours to upgrade. The changes were pretty trivial. John. On 2011-10-18, at 7:15 AM, Henrik Thostrup Jensen wrote:

Hi

Could you send out PDFs instead of the PPTs. Using Libreoffice, the slides look very wrong.

I also have the same question as Takahiro:

Do we use WSDL of Rio version or SC version?

Also, what is expected to be ready (e.g., hardware integration or duds similar to RIo) for FIA?

Best regards, Henrik

Henrik Thostrup Jensen <htj at ndgf.org> NORDUnet / Nordic Data Grid Facility.

On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Jerry Sobieski wrote:

...

Hi all-

Attached is topo .owl file v1.1.

The corrections were many, but almost all were mistakes I had missed in the initial pass.

- Changed "Pioneer" to "Pionier" - corrected several scProvider Endpoints - Corrected several STP references that were missing or incorrect. - Re-engineered JGN-X: JGNX is removed from the demo topology and AIST and KDDI Labs peer directly now with StarLight. (THis was due to no NSI version of OSCARS will be available at JGNX) Note: after this re-config, there are now only two SDPs linking StarLight & AIST (1780 & 1781), and likewise only two linking KDDI and StarLight (1782 & 1783).

Everyone: Please! If you have not confirmed your csProviderEndpoint with me, please do so. THese are critical to the whole mechanism, and the only soap endpoints I have are the ones we used for Rio...need to make sure these are still correct.

Note: there will be more changes, but the key topology elements are settling down now. The attached PPT reflects the basic demo topology and a slide about StarLight (for the StarLight engineers)

Thanks. Questions/corrections to me. Jerry

_______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg