Jerry, As chair, I encourage wide, inclusive discussions and outreach on NSI protocol to the end-user community. I am not sure about the attendance of NSI working group members at I2 member meeting to call it an official interim NSI working group session yet - is that what you had in mind? If you do lead a outreach discussion on NSI with the Internet2 member community, please do plan to capture the summary of the discussions and share with the mailing list. Thanks for your efforts, Inder
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Sobieski <mailto:jerry@nordu.net> June 23, 2011 4:13 AM
Hi all-
I think we should request and NSI session for Internet2. There will probably be a GLIF session also... I am of a mind to keep these separate as there are a lot of GLIF issues that are not NSI issues per se.
I'd like us to present an NSI update which will include the CS spec and the NSI demo at Rio. And perhaps some progress on NSI Topology and futures roadmap coming out of Rio.
The more we can promote this as an open inclusive process, the more uptake we'll get. Hopefully this will encourage others to get involved and possibly encourage more field trials by US regionals and campuses.
Thoughts? Deadline is 24th (tomorrow). If we generally think it is a good idea, I will submit a session request.
Jerry _______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
-- Inder Monga 510-486-6531 http://www.es.net Follow us on Twitter: ESnetUpdates/Twitter <http://bit.ly/bisCAd> Visit our blog: ESnetUpdates Blog <http://bit.ly/9lSTO3> Facebook: ESnetUpdates/Facebook <http://bit.ly/d2Olql>