OGF37 Arrangements and sessions
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e65ca6e8710db826c6845c3148d4d17a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Folks, It's time to register sessions of OGF37. There's noise from IDEL participants and we should schedule that this group meets. And I should be in a position to circulate a strawman on the gridsite delegation info doc real soon™. CA-ops mentioned that OGF37 was scheduled close to another similar meeting and folk might not be able to make it; I believe we should at least meet for one session to keep things ticking forward, but am happy to apply for more than 1 session if we thing there are items to discuss. If we will not be quorate then perhaps we should not have CA-ops VOMS proc has a straw-man doc that we need to work on so we need to schedule this session. Questions then: 1, Who will make it to OGF37 2, do we need 3 or 4 sessions to cover work (assuming CA-OPS)? 3, do we suspend CA-ops this time due to participation? also, 3, Jens Are you going, and is there a FedSec session? Rgds, Mike
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/82e264c3ca2cf0e9629ca846590ae35f.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi Mike, There is more afoot for OGF37; Andrew Grimshaw is planning to organise a specific workshop on (identity) delegation. He was going to write some paragraphs and send them around - probably around now. It would make sense to combine IDEL-WG with this activity (ie to host it as an extended IDEL-WG) - if you agree. 1. I haven't looked into the timing/flights/costs/logistics yet, so I don't know. 2. A day would seem reasonable (four sessions)? 3. Don't know; will leave to the chairs to decide. There is useful stuff to do, though, we have enough material for at least one session - a draft IGTF profile for SARoNGS et al (aka "LIVE"), updates from PMAs, 3. As regards FEDSEC I suspect there is more than enough useful new stuff floating around, but it'll depend on who is coming and to some extent how many documents I have time to put into a useful form before March... Cheers -j On 18/01/2013 17:01, Mike Jones wrote:
Folks,
It's time to register sessions of OGF37.
There's noise from IDEL participants and we should schedule that this group meets. And I should be in a position to circulate a strawman on the gridsite delegation info doc real soon^(TM).
CA-ops mentioned that OGF37 was scheduled close to another similar meeting and folk might not be able to make it; I believe we should at least meet for one session to keep things ticking forward, but am happy to apply for more than 1 session if we thing there are items to discuss. If we will not be quorate then perhaps we should not have CA-ops
VOMS proc has a straw-man doc that we need to work on so we need to schedule this session.
Questions then:
1, Who will make it to OGF37 2, do we need 3 or 4 sessions to cover work (assuming CA-OPS)? 3, do we suspend CA-ops this time due to participation? also, 3, Jens Are you going, and is there a FedSec session?
Rgds, Mike
_______________________________________________ Idel-wg mailing list Idel-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/idel-wg
-- Scanned by iCritical.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4c3e91ef104c429dfc2d1bbd57f1e985.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi Mike, Jens, and all, I'm planning to go to OGF37, but I need to leave there on Wednesday (13th). So, if we have CAOPs session(s), I would expect that it will be on Monday or Tuesday. -- Yoshio Tanaka (yoshio.tanaka@aist.go.jp) From: Jens Jensen <jens.jensen@stfc.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [voms-proc-wg] [Idel-wg] OGF37 Arrangements and sessions Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:01:19 +0000 Message-ID: <50FC06BF.9030700@stfc.ac.uk>
Hi Mike,
There is more afoot for OGF37; Andrew Grimshaw is planning to organise a specific workshop on (identity) delegation. He was going to write some paragraphs and send them around - probably around now. It would make sense to combine IDEL-WG with this activity (ie to host it as an extended IDEL-WG) - if you agree.
1. I haven't looked into the timing/flights/costs/logistics yet, so I don't know. 2. A day would seem reasonable (four sessions)? 3. Don't know; will leave to the chairs to decide. There is useful stuff to do, though, we have enough material for at least one session - a draft IGTF profile for SARoNGS et al (aka "LIVE"), updates from PMAs, 3. As regards FEDSEC I suspect there is more than enough useful new stuff floating around, but it'll depend on who is coming and to some extent how many documents I have time to put into a useful form before March...
Cheers -j
On 18/01/2013 17:01, Mike Jones wrote:
Folks,
It's time to register sessions of OGF37.
There's noise from IDEL participants and we should schedule that this group meets. And I should be in a position to circulate a strawman on the gridsite delegation info doc real soon^(TM).
CA-ops mentioned that OGF37 was scheduled close to another similar meeting and folk might not be able to make it; I believe we should at least meet for one session to keep things ticking forward, but am happy to apply for more than 1 session if we thing there are items to discuss. If we will not be quorate then perhaps we should not have CA-ops
VOMS proc has a straw-man doc that we need to work on so we need to schedule this session.
Questions then:
1, Who will make it to OGF37 2, do we need 3 or 4 sessions to cover work (assuming CA-OPS)? 3, do we suspend CA-ops this time due to participation? also, 3, Jens Are you going, and is there a FedSec session?
Rgds, Mike
_______________________________________________ Idel-wg mailing list Idel-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/idel-wg
-- Scanned by iCritical.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/82e264c3ca2cf0e9629ca846590ae35f.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi Yoshio, I think there are others who have similar constraints. Cheers --jens On 31/01/2013 08:59, Yoshio Tanaka wrote:
Hi Mike, Jens, and all,
I'm planning to go to OGF37, but I need to leave there on Wednesday (13th). So, if we have CAOPs session(s), I would expect that it will be on Monday or Tuesday.
-- Yoshio Tanaka (yoshio.tanaka@aist.go.jp)
From: Jens Jensen <jens.jensen@stfc.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [voms-proc-wg] [Idel-wg] OGF37 Arrangements and sessions Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:01:19 +0000 Message-ID: <50FC06BF.9030700@stfc.ac.uk>
Hi Mike,
There is more afoot for OGF37; Andrew Grimshaw is planning to organise a specific workshop on (identity) delegation. He was going to write some paragraphs and send them around - probably around now. It would make sense to combine IDEL-WG with this activity (ie to host it as an extended IDEL-WG) - if you agree.
1. I haven't looked into the timing/flights/costs/logistics yet, so I don't know. 2. A day would seem reasonable (four sessions)? 3. Don't know; will leave to the chairs to decide. There is useful stuff to do, though, we have enough material for at least one session - a draft IGTF profile for SARoNGS et al (aka "LIVE"), updates from PMAs, 3. As regards FEDSEC I suspect there is more than enough useful new stuff floating around, but it'll depend on who is coming and to some extent how many documents I have time to put into a useful form before March...
Cheers -j
On 18/01/2013 17:01, Mike Jones wrote:
Folks,
It's time to register sessions of OGF37.
There's noise from IDEL participants and we should schedule that this group meets. And I should be in a position to circulate a strawman on the gridsite delegation info doc real soon^(TM).
CA-ops mentioned that OGF37 was scheduled close to another similar meeting and folk might not be able to make it; I believe we should at least meet for one session to keep things ticking forward, but am happy to apply for more than 1 session if we thing there are items to discuss. If we will not be quorate then perhaps we should not have CA-ops
VOMS proc has a straw-man doc that we need to work on so we need to schedule this session.
Questions then:
1, Who will make it to OGF37 2, do we need 3 or 4 sessions to cover work (assuming CA-OPS)? 3, do we suspend CA-ops this time due to participation? also, 3, Jens Are you going, and is there a FedSec session?
Rgds, Mike
_______________________________________________ Idel-wg mailing list Idel-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/idel-wg
-- Scanned by iCritical.
-- Scanned by iCritical.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f93592852bac53b82654044c3bcd6fe9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Dear Mike et al, I am afraid that I will no be able to attend OGF37. Sorry! Regards Dave ------------------------------------------------ Dr David Kelsey Particle Physics Department Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, DIDCOT, OX11 0QX, UK e-mail: david.kelsey@stfc.ac.uk Tel: [+44](0)1235 445746 (direct) Fax: [+44](0)1235 446733 ------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- From: caops-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:caops-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones Sent: 18 January 2013 17:02 To: voms-proc-wg@ogf.org; CAOPS-WG; idel-wg@ogf.org Subject: [caops-wg] OGF37 Arrangements and sessions
Folks,
It's time to register sessions of OGF37.
There's noise from IDEL participants and we should schedule that this group meets. And I should be in a position to circulate a strawman on the gridsite delegation info doc real soon™.
CA-ops mentioned that OGF37 was scheduled close to another similar meeting and folk might not be able to make it; I believe we should at least meet for one session to keep things ticking forward, but am happy to apply for more than 1 session if we thing there are items to discuss. If we will not be quorate then perhaps we should not have CA- ops
VOMS proc has a straw-man doc that we need to work on so we need to schedule this session.
Questions then:
1, Who will make it to OGF37 2, do we need 3 or 4 sessions to cover work (assuming CA-OPS)? 3, do we suspend CA-ops this time due to participation? also, 3, Jens Are you going, and is there a FedSec session?
Rgds, Mike
participants (4)
-
david.kelsey@stfc.ac.uk
-
Jens Jensen
-
Mike Jones
-
Yoshio Tanaka