Dear all, please find in the attachement a new version of the draft with the modifications suggested by Stephen: - all the new objects called "CloudComputeXxx" were renamed "CloudComputingXxx" to be consistent with the existing objects - Modified the definition of Benchmark class including the relation to cloud objects; deleted the Benchmark paragraph in the cloud section - updated the StorageAccessProtocol definition adding the relation with ToCloudComputingService - after the recent changes, it needs to produce a new version of some of the UML class diagrams With Stephen, we also noticed that there are still some open questions that need to be discussed in the group: - The naming of ToCloudStorageService is maybe not ideal since it suggests that it relates to a CloudStorageService object, which isn't true. We may want to discuss that more in the group. An option could be *CloudComputingServiceToStorageService*, but that's quite long - for the 2.0 schema we decided to make it shorter, but that creates a small problem now. Or maybe it should have a different naming style, since it's somewhat different to the existing object. Other options: *CloudToStorageService* (to keep the name short), ... - in the StorageService definition is not included the relation to ToComputingService class so do we need to include the association to ToCloudComputingService? Same question for StorageService and ToStorageService / ToCloudStorageService classes Best regards, Alessandro -- Dr. Alessandro Paolini Operations Officer - EGI.eu Science Park 140 1098 XG Amsterdam The Netherlands skype: alessandro.paolini.egi ********************************* "I believe in the power of laughter and tears" "as an antidote to hatred and terror" "A day without laughter" "is a wasted day" >>> Charlie Chaplin