please find in the attachement a new version of the draft with the modifications suggested by Stephen:

- all the new objects called "CloudComputeXxx" were renamed "CloudComputingXxx" to be consistent with the existing objects

- Modified the definition of Benchmark class including the relation to cloud objects; deleted the Benchmark paragraph in the cloud section

- updated the StorageAccessProtocol definition adding the relation with ToCloudComputingService

With Stephen, we also noticed that there are still some open questions that need to be discussed in the group:

- The naming of ToCloudStorageService is maybe not ideal since it suggests that it relates to a CloudStorageService object, which isn't true. We may want to discuss that more in the group. An option could be CloudComputingServiceToStorageService, but that's quite long - for the 2.0 schema we decided to make it shorter, but that creates a small problem now. Or maybe it should have a different naming style, since it's somewhat different to the existing object.
Other options: CloudToStorageService (to keep the name short), ...

- in the StorageService definition is not included the relation to ToComputingService class so do we need to include the association to ToCloudComputingService? Same question for StorageService and ToStorageService / ToCloudStorageService classes