Hi John, For me the preferred day would be May 17th because: - today and tomorrow EGI.eu is closed for national holidays in Netherlands (King's Day), and if I have to prepare some slides I won't have enough time for may 3rd (moreover it clashes a bit with another phone meeting scheduled that afternoon, by chance with US people) - From May 31st to June 2nd I'm being busy in a FitSM training event Cheers, Alessandro Il 26/apr/2016 20:14, "Navarro, JP" <navarro@mcs.anl.gov> ha scritto:
Dear GLUE-WG,
Would any of the following dates work for a teleconference to discuss the new Cloud specification?
May 3 May 17 May 31
at the usual: 15:30-17:00 Central Europe, 8:30-10:00 AM US Central
Please reply with hay/nay by COB this Friday.
Regards,
JP Navarro
On Apr 26, 2016, at 3:55 AM, Alessandro Paolini <alessandro.paolini@egi.eu> wrote:
Dear all,
please find in the attachement a new version of the draft with the modifications suggested by Stephen:
- all the new objects called "CloudComputeXxx" were renamed "CloudComputingXxx" to be consistent with the existing objects
- Modified the definition of Benchmark class including the relation to cloud objects; deleted the Benchmark paragraph in the cloud section
- updated the StorageAccessProtocol definition adding the relation with ToCloudComputingService
- after the recent changes, it needs to produce a new version of some of the UML class diagrams
With Stephen, we also noticed that there are still some open questions that need to be discussed in the group:
- The naming of ToCloudStorageService is maybe not ideal since it suggests that it relates to a CloudStorageService object, which isn't true. We may want to discuss that more in the group. An option could be *CloudComputingServiceToStorageService*, but that's quite long - for the 2.0 schema we decided to make it shorter, but that creates a small problem now. Or maybe it should have a different naming style, since it's somewhat different to the existing object. Other options: *CloudToStorageService* (to keep the name short), ...
- in the StorageService definition is not included the relation to ToComputingService class so do we need to include the association to ToCloudComputingService? Same question for StorageService and ToStorageService / ToCloudStorageService classes
Best regards, Alessandro
-- Dr. Alessandro Paolini Operations Officer - EGI.eu <http://egi.eu> Science Park 140 1098 XG Amsterdam The Netherlands skype: alessandro.paolini.egi ********************************* "I believe in the power of laughter and tears" "as an antidote to hatred and terror" "A day without laughter" "is a wasted day" >>> Charlie Chaplin <glue2.1-draft_v0.2.doc>_______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg