Hi John,

For me the preferred day would be May 17th because:

- today and tomorrow EGI.eu is closed for national holidays in Netherlands (King's Day), and if I have to prepare some slides I won't have enough time for may 3rd (moreover it clashes a bit with another phone meeting scheduled that afternoon, by chance with US people)

- From May 31st to June 2nd I'm being busy in a FitSM training event

Cheers,
Alessandro

Il 26/apr/2016 20:14, "Navarro, JP" <navarro@mcs.anl.gov> ha scritto:
Dear GLUE-WG,

Would any of the following dates work for a teleconference to discuss the new Cloud specification?

May 3
May 17
May 31

at the usual: 15:30-17:00 Central Europe, 8:30-10:00 AM US Central

Please reply with hay/nay by COB this Friday.

Regards,

JP Navarro

On Apr 26, 2016, at 3:55 AM, Alessandro Paolini <alessandro.paolini@egi.eu> wrote:

Dear all,

please find in the attachement a new version of the draft with the modifications suggested by Stephen:

- all the new objects called "CloudComputeXxx" were renamed "CloudComputingXxx" to be consistent with the existing objects

- Modified the definition of Benchmark class including the relation to cloud objects; deleted the Benchmark paragraph in the cloud section

- updated the StorageAccessProtocol definition adding the relation with ToCloudComputingService

- after the recent changes, it needs to produce a new version of some of the UML class diagrams

With Stephen, we also noticed that there are still some open questions that need to be discussed in the group:

- The naming of ToCloudStorageService is maybe not ideal since it suggests that it relates to a CloudStorageService object, which isn't true. We may want to discuss that more in the group. An option could be CloudComputingServiceToStorageService, but that's quite long - for the 2.0 schema we decided to make it shorter, but that creates a small problem now. Or maybe it should have a different naming style, since it's somewhat different to the existing object.
Other options: CloudToStorageService (to keep the name short), ...

- in the StorageService definition is not included the relation to ToComputingService class so do we need to include the association to ToCloudComputingService? Same question for StorageService and ToStorageService / ToCloudStorageService classes


Best regards,
Alessandro


--
Dr. Alessandro Paolini
Operations Officer - EGI.eu
Science Park 140
1098 XG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
skype: alessandro.paolini.egi
*********************************
"I believe in the power of laughter and tears"
    "as an antidote to hatred and terror"
          "A day without laughter"
             "is a wasted day" >>> Charlie Chaplin
<glue2.1-draft_v0.2.doc>_______________________________________________
glue-wg mailing list
glue-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg