Hi, The new cloud related entities are quite disjunct and do not amend the existing services, hence bumping the spec. version to 2.1 seems to be the natural choice (so far). I would vote for "2". Cheers, Shiraz On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:36 PM, JP Navarro <navarro@mcs.anl.gov<mailto:navarro@mcs.anl.gov>> wrote: GLUE Working Group: We have been discussing two options for using the GLUE schema to describe cloud services. You may review these options here: - http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13294?download= By August 1, please vote for one of the following options: 1) Use GLUE 2.0 with a Community Practice Profile that details how to describe cloud infrastructure using the existing 2.0 entities 2) Develop GLUE 2.1 adding new Cloud Computing entities (would be 100% backward compatible with GLUE 2.0 for non-Cloud entities) For reference, a preliminary GLUE 2.1 Specification is available here: - http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/glue-wg/2014-January/001527.html Regards, JP _______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org<mailto:glue-wg@ogf.org> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg -- Ahmed Shiraz Memon Federated Systems and Data Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC) Phone: +49 2461 61 6899 Fax: +49 2461 61 6656 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH 52425 Juelich Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender), Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt, Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------