Hi,

The new cloud related entities are quite disjunct and do not amend the existing services, hence bumping the spec. version to 2.1 seems to be the natural choice (so far). I would vote for "2".

Cheers,
Shiraz

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:36 PM, JP Navarro <navarro@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

GLUE Working Group:

We have been discussing two options for using the GLUE schema to describe cloud services. You may review these options here:
- http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13294?download=

By August 1, please vote for one of the following options:

1) Use GLUE 2.0 with a Community Practice Profile that details how to describe cloud infrastructure using the existing 2.0 entities
2) Develop GLUE 2.1 adding new Cloud Computing entities (would be 100% backward compatible with GLUE 2.0 for non-Cloud entities)

For reference, a preliminary GLUE 2.1 Specification is available here:
- http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/glue-wg/2014-January/001527.html

Regards,

JP
_______________________________________________
glue-wg mailing list
glue-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg

--
Ahmed Shiraz Memon

Federated Systems and Data
Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC)

Phone: +49 2461 61 6899
Fax: +49 2461 61 6656