- glue-wg - lists.ogf.org

GLUE 2.0 - draft 20
by Sergio Andreozzi 03 Feb '08

03 Feb '08

Dear all, you can find a new spec of the GLUE 2.0 Spec: http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/viewDocument/projects.glue-wg/docman.root… changes: - added inherited properties in computing entities - changing font size of table from 10 to 8 - removed storage entities (to be separated in a different document up to OGF22, to be merged just before) - several editorial changes to improve formatting Cheers, Sergio -- Sergio Andreozzi INFN-CNAF, Tel: +39 051 609 2860 Viale Berti Pichat, 6/2 Fax: +39 051 609 2746 40126 Bologna (Italy) Web: http://www.cnaf.infn.it/~andreozzi

2 2

telecons today and next week
by Sergio Andreozzi 01 Feb '08

01 Feb '08

Dear all, could you please express your availability for the tentative today and next weeks calls using this survey? http://www.doodle.ch/participation.html?pollId=prq23twt6q3s5g36 add comments to the survey if you want to propose different time slots. Thanks, Sergio -- Sergio Andreozzi INFN-CNAF, Tel: +39 051 609 2860 Viale Berti Pichat, 6/2 Fax: +39 051 609 2746 40126 Bologna (Italy) Web: http://www.cnaf.infn.it/~andreozzi

1 1

Characterizing computing capacity in heterogeneous environment - the Amazon approach
by Sergio Andreozzi 30 Jan '08

30 Jan '08

Dear all, I suggest to give a look at the Amazon approach about the characterization of computing capacity that is provided in heterogeneous an on-demand environment: http://www.amazon.com/b/ref=sc_fe_c_0_201590011_2?ie=UTF8&node=370375011&no… Cheers, Sergio -- Sergio Andreozzi INFN-CNAF, Tel: +39 051 609 2860 Viale Berti Pichat, 6/2 Fax: +39 051 609 2746 40126 Bologna (Italy) Web: http://www.cnaf.infn.it/~andreozzi

3 2

Updated version of appendix D.
by Paul Millar 29 Jan '08

29 Jan '08

Hi all, I've tried to incorporate the comments from the meeting in the new version of Appendix D. Specifically: o included Stephen's ideas on how to embed additional information, o updated the section on whether metrics are required or not (para 2 of intro), o added the initial slash to the filepath, o included multiple examples, o removed the section on counting numbers, o added a new section on email addresses (previously missing), o tidied up the sections on URIs and DNs, o changed the integer section so it's using "all nines" instead (inc. a mention of Benford's law). Please let me know if I've missed anything. Cheers, Paul. --- Appendix D : place-holder values for unknown data (v1.0) ---- Introduction --- Whilst people endeavour to provide accurate information, there may be situations where specific GLUE values may be assigned place-holder (or dummy) values. These place-holder values carry some additional semantic meaning; specifically, that the correct value is currently unknown and the presented value should be ignored. This appendix describes a recommended set of place-holder values to use. Some metrics within the GLUE schema are required whilst others are optional. If the metric is optional and the corresponding information is unavailable, the information provider may choose to publish a place-holder or it may choose not to publish the metric. If the metric is required, then the information must either publish a place-holder value or refrain from publishing the GLUE object. If a place-holder value is published, it must conform to the scheme described in this appendix. This is to increase the likelihood that software will understand the nature of the information it receives. To avoid confusion, these place-holder values have be chosen so they are obvious "wrong" to humans, unlikely to occur under normal operation and valid within the metric type. This also allows for detection of failing information provider components. Use-cases: --- There are two principle use-cases for place-holder values, although others may exist. Scenario 1. a static value has no good default value and has not been configured for a particular site. Some provisions for GLUE Schema provide templates. These templates may contain static values that have no good default value; for example, a value may require some detailed knowledge of a site. Whilst there may be the expectation that value be configured it is possible that this did not happen, so exposing the application's default configuration. Scenario 2. information provider is unable to obtain a dynamic value. A dynamic value is provided by an information provider by querying the underlying grid resources. This query will use a number of ancillary resources (e.g., DNS, network hardware) that might fail; the grid services might also fail. If a metric is required and the current value is unobtainable, a place-holder must be used. Place-holder values: --- This section describes a number of values that can be represented within a given address space (e.g., UTF-8, Integers, FQDNs, IPv4 address space). Each of the different types are introduced along with the proposed value and a brief discussion on the rational and any other considerations. 1. Simple strings (ASCII/UTF-8) should use "UNDEFINEDVALUE" or should start "UNDEFINEDVALUE:" Upper-case letters make it easier to spot and a single word avoids any white-space issues. A short error message can be incorporated into the message by appending the message after the colon. Examples: UNDEFINEDVALUE UNDEFINEDVALUE: Unable to contact torque daemon. Using UNDEFINEDVALUE is a default option for strings that have no widely-known structure. If a value is of a more restrictive sub-type (e.g., FQDNs, FQANs) described below, then the rules for more restrictive form must be used. 2. Fully qualified domain names: must use a hostname ending either "example.org" for scenario 1, or "invalid" for scenario 2. RFC 2606 reserves the "invalid" Top-Level-Domain (TLD) as always invalid and clearly so. For dynamic information gathering, a value ending "invalid" must be used. It is recommended that this is "unknown.invalid" be used unless the class of machine is known. RFC 2606 also defines two second-level domains: "example.org" and "example.com". These domains have the advantage of ending with a recognisable TLD, so are recognisable as a DNS name. Default configuration (scenario 1, above) must use DNS names that end "example.com" or "example.org" Additional information can be included by specifying a prefix to the more broad part; for example, "your-CE" can be appended to "example.org" in a configuration file to form "your-CE.example.org". This may be used to specify the class of machine that should be present. Examples: www.example.org your-CE.example.org unknown.invalid site-local-BDII.invalid 3. IPv4 addr: should use 192.0.2.250 There are several portions of IPv4 addresses that should not appear on a network, but none that are reserved for documentation or to specify a non-existent address. Using any address leads to the risk of side-effects, should this value be used. The best option is an IP address from the 192.0.2.0/24 subnet. This subnet is defined in RFC 3330 as "TEST-NET" for use in documentation and example code. For consistency, the value 192.0.2.250 must be used. 5. IPv6 addr: should use 2001:DB8::FFFF There is no documented undefined IPv6 address. RFC 3849 reserves the address prefix 2001:DB8::/32 for documentation. For consistency, the address 2001:DB8::FFFF must be used. 6. Integers: must use "all nines" For uint32/int32 this is 999,999,999 " int64/int64 this is 999,999,999,999,999,999 For integers, all numbers expressible within the encoding (int32/uint32/etc...) are valid so there is no safe choice. If an unsigned integer is encoded as a signed integer, it is possible to use negative numbers safely. However, these numbers will be unrepresentable if the number is stored as an unsigned integer. For this reason a negative number place-holder must not be used. The number was chosen for three reasons. First, metric scales are often chosen to reduce the likelihood of overflow: numbers towards MAXINT (the large number representable in an integer domain) are less likely to appear. Second, repeated numbers stand out more clearly to humans. Finally, the statistical frequency of measured values often follows Benford's law, which indicates that numbers starting with "1" occur far more frequently than those starting with "9" (about six times the probability). For these reasons, information providers must use all-nines to indicate an unknown value. 7. Filepath: must start either "/UNDEFINEDPATH" or "\UNDEFINEDPATH". As with the simple string, a single upper-case word is recommended. The initial slash indicates that the value is a path. Implementations must use whichever slash is most appropriate for the corresponding system (Unix-like systems use a forward-slash). Software should accept either value as an unknown-value place-holder. Additional information can be encoded as data beyond the initial UNDEFINEDPATH, separated by the same slash as started the value. Additional comments should not use any of the following characters: \ [ ] ; = " \ : | , * . Examples: /UNDEFINEDPATH \UNDEFINEDPATH /UNDEFINEDPATH/Broker unavailable 8. Email addresses: must use an undefined FQDN for the domain. RFC 2822 defines emails addresses to have the form: <local-part> '@' <domain> The <domain> must be an undefined FQDN; see above for a complete description. For email addresses, information providers should use "example.org" for scenario 1. and "unknown.invalid" for scenario 2. The <local-part> may be used to encode a small amount of additional information, for example, the class of user to whom the email address should be delivered. If no such information is to be encoded the value "user" should be used. Examples: site-local-contact(a)example.org local-admin(a)example.org user(a)unknown.invalid 9. Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): schema-specific RFC 3986 defines URIs as a "federated and extensible naming system." All URIs start with a schema-name part and no schema-name has been reserved for undefined or documenting example values. For any given URI schema ("http", for example), it may be possible to define an undefined value within that name-space. If a GLUE value has only one valid schema, the undefined value must be taken from that schema. If several schemata are possible, one must be chosen from the available options, which should be the most commonly used. Take care with the URI encoding. All unknown URI values must be valid URIs. If additional information is included, it must be encoded so the resulting URI is valid. For schemata that include a FQDN (e.g., a reference to an Internet host), an undefined URI must use an undefined FQDN; see above for details on undefined FQDNs. URI schemata that reference a remote file (e.g., "http", "https"), additional information may be included as the path. The FQDN indicates that the value is a place-holder, indicating an unknown value, so information providers need not specify "UNDEFINEDPATH". For "file" URIs, the path part must identify the value as unknown and must use the forward-slash variant; see above for details on undefined paths. For "mailto" URIs [RFC 2368] encapsulates valid email addresses with additional information (such as email headers and message body). Unknown mailto URIs must use an unknown email address (see above). Any additional information must be included in the email body. There may be other schemata in use that are not explicitly covered in this section. A place-holder value should be agreed upon within whichever domain such schemata are used. This place-holder value should be in the spirit of the place-holder values described so far. Examples: http://www.example.org/ httpg://your-CE.example.org/path/to/end-point mailto:site-admin@example.org mailto:user@maildomain.invalid?body=Problem%20connecting%20to%20RB file:///UNDEFINEDPATH file:///UNDEFINEDPATH/path%20to%20some%20directory 10. X509 Distinguished Names: must include a RDN of CN=UNDEFINEDUSER X509 uses a X500 namespace, represented as several Relative Domain-Names (RDNs) concatenated by forward-slashes. The final RDN is usually a single common name (CN), although multiple CNs are allowed. Unknown DN values must have at least two entries: an initial O=Grid followed immediately by CN=UNDEFINEDUSER. Additional information can be encoded using extra CN entries. These must come after CN=UNDEFINEDUSER. Examples: /O=Grid/CN=UNDEFINEDUSE /O=Grid/CN=UNDEFINEDUSER/CN=Your Grid certificate DN here /O=Grid/CN=UNDEFINEDUSER/CN=Cannot access SE Definition of words: --- The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are used deliberately and take their meaning from RFC 2119. A brief summary is given here. 1. MUST (or "REQUIRED") means that no deviation is allowed from conforming software. 2. MUST NOT means complete prohibition of this behaviour with conforming software. 3. SHOULD (or "RECOMMENDED") means that there may be reasons why conforming software does not to adopt this behaviour, but all the effects of an alternative behaviour must be understood and considered before choosing a different course. 4. SHOULD NOT (or "NOT RECOMMENDED") means that there may be reasons why conforming software adopts this behaviour, but all the effects of an alternative behaviour must be understood and considered before choosing a different course. 5. MAY (or "OPTIONAL") means an item is completely optional.

2 11

Publishing "exchange rates" using GLUE
by Viljoen, MJ (Matthew) 28 Jan '08

28 Jan '08

Hi, In the NGS we have a requirement for a mechanism whereby users can be "charged" different rates when using a resource, depending on which VO they are a member of. By charged I don't mean in monetary terms, but rather in time. So for example using 1 hour of a resource with exchange rate 1 is accounted as one hour of usage for that resource; using an hour of a resource with exchange rate 2 is accounted as 2 hours etc. Such a system will allow resource providers to prioritize usage for different VOs. Does anyone use such a system using GLUE to publish exchange rate information? If necessary we can formulate this requirement into a use case for GLUE 2.0 Matt

2 1

Phone conf
by Burke, S (Stephen) 25 Jan '08

25 Jan '08

Hi, I'll be a bit late, I'm still in another meeting. Stephen

1 0

Cannot make today telecon
by Sergio Andreozzi 24 Jan '08

24 Jan '08

Dear all, unfortunately I cannot make the today telecon. I propose to move it to the next week. I'm available both 31 Jan and 1 Feb. The next scheduled telecon is for tomorrow and is related to Storage Entities: http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/PhoneMeeting… Cheers, Sergio -- Sergio Andreozzi INFN-CNAF, Tel: +39 051 609 2860 Viale Berti Pichat, 6/2 Fax: +39 051 609 2746 40126 Bologna (Italy) Web: http://www.cnaf.infn.it/~andreozzi

1 0

Minutes of today telecon and reminder for tomorrow telecon (3 PM GMT)
by Sergio Andreozzi 23 Jan '08

23 Jan '08

Hi everybody, here are the minutes of the today telecon: http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/PhoneMeeting… please, remember that we have another call tomorrow about status of renderings: http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/PhoneMeeting… Cheers, Sergio -- Sergio Andreozzi INFN-CNAF, Tel: +39 051 609 2860 Viale Berti Pichat, 6/2 Fax: +39 051 609 2746 40126 Bologna (Italy) Web: http://www.cnaf.infn.it/~andreozzi

1 0

[Invitation] Info/data modeling architecture @ 2008-01-24 07:00 - 08:00 ()
by Hiro Kishimoto 23 Jan '08

23 Jan '08

glue-wg(a)ogf.org, you are invited to Title: Info/data modeling architecture Time: 2008-01-24 07:00 - 08:00 (Central Time) Calendar: Description: When: 8-9am EDT, 7-8am CDT, 5-6am PDT, 10-11pm JST, 1-2pm UK Dial-in numbers for Thursday: US: +1 718 3541071 (New York) or +1 408 9616509 (San Jose) UK: +44 (0)207 3655269 (London) Germany: +49 (0)69 50070802 (Frankfurt) Switzerland: +41 (0)1 8009574 (Zurich) Japan: +81 (0)3 3570 8225 (Tokyo) PIN: 4371991 See more information: - https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/wiki1477 Screen share service: URL: http://ogsa.glance.net/ Usage: https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/wiki1584 Note: ** OGF IPR POLICY APPLIES ** http://www.ogf.org/About/abt_policies.php 1) Early discussion Note taker assignment - https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/wiki1848 Roll call Minutes approval and AI review (see the bottom of this agenda) Agenda bashing 2) Minutes approval and AI review Minutes for approval Nov. 29 call: https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc14951 F2F meeting: https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc14990 Action Item review http://forge.ogf.org/short/ogsa-wg/ailist 2) info/data modeling architecture (Ellen Stokes) Ellen would like all updates in by the end of January with the intention to do a working group last call for this document at the start of February. OGSA WG review of the revised document scheduled for Thursday 24th January. https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc13726 3) info/data modeling guideline (Fred Machiel) Fred will revise guideline document and have a group review. Then submit the document to OGF editor for publication. https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc12798 4) Any other business You can view this event at http://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=MDU0cGQ5NW82OTNyMjRtMW… You are receiving this courtesy email at the account glue-wg(a)ogf.org because you are an attendee of this event. To stop receiving future notifications for this event, decline this event. Alternatively you can sign up for a Google Calendar account at http://www.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification settings for your entire calendar.

1 0

ongoing telecon - moving to CERN telecon system
by Sergio Andreozzi 23 Jan '08

23 Jan '08

Hi, after an initial part of the telecon with good quality, we have to move to CERN telecon system because of some echo. The number to call is: +41 22 76 77000 Cheers, Sergio -- Sergio Andreozzi INFN-CNAF, Tel: +39 051 609 2860 Viale Berti Pichat, 6/2 Fax: +39 051 609 2746 40126 Bologna (Italy) Web: http://www.cnaf.infn.it/~andreozzi

1 0