30 Mar
2005
30 Mar
'05
8:57 p.m.
[ .. ]
The routine return code would need to indicate a compound error; BTW we do not have such error code defined, and the detailed error message would need to detail what happened.
In other words, the spec completely fails to address this case. Something to keep in mind for 1.1 or 2.0.
It looks like no specifics are necessary for defining the compound error. Should we give it a thought now and put it in the revised v1.0 if it remains relatively simple to define and implement? -H