[drmaa-wg] Monitoring DRMAA jobs by other means

Hi, I have being reading one of the BES-WG debates and this comment from Ian Foster made me think about enhancing DRMAA job monitoring: "I suggest (as we have also suggested in earlier communications to BES-WG) that we should instead allow the user to specify a set of activities that are to be monitored or controlled in terms of their properties, not names. E.g., "activities that belong to me", "activities that involve executable Foo", "activities that have been running for over 2 hours." This is 2.0 stuff for DRMAA. Nevertheless, it could be worthwhile to monitor the end user requests like ones in this proposal. -Hrabri