Thanks for pointing that out. I'll file an issue against SGE, and add the missing error code. Daniel Peter Troeger wrote On 02/04/06 21:46,:
Am 04.02.2006 um 21:26 schrieb Peter Troeger:
Meanwhile I'm surprised by something: in the ST_SUPPORTED_ATTR test the program checks the drmaa_get_next_attr_name() return code, comparing it with DRMAA_ERRNO_SUCCESS and then with DRMAA_ERRNO_INVALID_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE. If the return code is neither of these values, the test fails. I understood that the drmaa_get_next_attr_name() function was supposed to return DRMAA_ERRNO_NO_MORE_ELEMENTS when the end of the list is reached. That's what my lib does, and the therefore the test fails.
Where am I wrong ?
Nowhere. I will fix this immediately. The more interesting question is while earlier tests with other implementations didn't brought that up (Dan, Andreas ?).
Ok, I found it. The C-binding spec 1.0 introduced DRMAA_ERRNO_NO_MORE_ELEMENTS as new error code (see also tracker issue #1173). SGE, Condor and the current test suite where mainly implemented according to C-binding v0.95, so this is a historical bug.
Peter.
Thanks !
Peter.
Thanks for the help.
Matthieu Cargnelli
-- *************************************************** * Daniel Templeton UMPK18 x83749 * * Staff Engineer, Sun N1 Grid Engine * *************************************************** * An "intellectual" is a man who takes more * * words than he needs to say more than he knows. * * -Dwight D. Eisenhower * ***************************************************