34.2 Conventions All indexing of positions in this document ... Should say appendix. Glossary: The definitions of LSB and MSB are not exactly symmetric. MSB has missing words in a couple of places. Regards Steve Hanson Architect, IBM DFDL Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group IBM SWG, Hursley, UK smh@uk.ibm.com tel:+44-1962-815848 From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com> To: "dfdl-wg@ogf.org" <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>, Date: 31/07/2014 22:12 Subject: [DFDL-WG] draft r20 Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org I have posted draft r20 to redmine. Resolved a few comment bubbles raised by steve h. - moved a few things from Appendix on standard charsets to glossary, improved examples there. Changed header and footer to August 2014. Added missing "Code Point" glossary entry. Minor editorial fixes. I believe the only thing left is to get the bit-order materials finalized and in. One open: Steve H suggested appendix tables and figures should be numbered A.1, A.2, B.1, etc. I am uncertain how to do this, so r20 is content changes, if I can figure out how to do the numbering that will be another revision. Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | www.tresys.com Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Steve Hanson <smh@uk.ibm.com> wrote: Mike Reviewed draft r18, and created draft r19. A few editorial changes, plus some editorial comments, plus a comment about the Glossary definition of Bit Position for when bitOrder is added. I'll let you post to Redmine in case you want to make any more edits. Regards Steve Hanson Architect, IBM DFDL Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group IBM SWG, Hursley, UK smh@uk.ibm.com tel:+44-1962-815848 From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com> To: "dfdl-wg@ogf.org" <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>, Date: 25/07/2014 02:34 Subject: [DFDL-WG] draft r18 on redmine Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org I posted spec r18 to redmine. This incorporates all the errata as of the 1.5 experience doc 1. One exception - the errata about implementation-defined and implementation-dependent. I went through and updated all the places where this was not correctly stated per Jonathan's document. However, I did not create an appendix also listing all these things. That turns out to be hard to do, and redundant (you end up copying text blocks - then they're in two places....) I think if we want an index to everyplace that "implementation-defined" and "implementation-dependent" appear in the document, that's what an index is for, so we should generate one and put those in as indexed terms. I added the appendix of DFDL Standard Character Set Encodings, which includes both 7-bit and 6-bit flavors now. I believe the last thing to do is bit order, but that should be reviewed as a separate document first. Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | www.tresys.com Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy -- dfdl-wg mailing list dfdl-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU -- dfdl-wg mailing list dfdl-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU