34.2 Conventions
All indexing of positions in this document
...
Should say appendix.
Glossary: The definitions of LSB and
MSB are not exactly symmetric. MSB has missing words in a couple
of places.
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM
DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF
DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
From:
Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To:
"dfdl-wg@ogf.org"
<dfdl-wg@ogf.org>,
Date:
31/07/2014 22:12
Subject:
[DFDL-WG] draft
r20
Sent by:
dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org
I have posted draft r20 to redmine.
- Resolved a few comment bubbles raised by steve h. - moved
a few things from Appendix on standard charsets to glossary, improved examples
there.
- Changed header and footer to August 2014.
- Added missing "Code Point" glossary entry.
- Minor editorial fixes.
I believe the only thing left is to get the bit-order
materials finalized and in.
One open: Steve H suggested appendix tables and figures should be numbered
A.1, A.2, B.1, etc. I am uncertain how to do this, so r20 is content changes,
if I can figure out how to do the numbering that will be another revision.
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology
| www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email
discussions are subject to the OGF
Intellectual Property Policy
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Steve Hanson <smh@uk.ibm.com>
wrote:
Mike
Reviewed draft r18, and created draft r19. A few editorial changes, plus
some editorial comments, plus a comment about the Glossary definition of
Bit Position for when bitOrder is added. I'll let you post to Redmine in
case you want to make any more edits.
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM
DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF
DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
From: Mike
Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To: "dfdl-wg@ogf.org"
<dfdl-wg@ogf.org>,
Date: 25/07/2014
02:34
Subject: [DFDL-WG]
draft r18 on redmine
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org
I posted spec r18 to redmine.
This incorporates all the errata as of the 1.5 experience doc 1.
- One exception - the errata about implementation-defined
and implementation-dependent. I went through and updated all the places
where this was not correctly stated per Jonathan's document.
- However, I did not create an appendix also listing all
these things. That turns out to be hard to do, and redundant (you end up
copying text blocks - then they're in two places....)
- I think if we want an index to everyplace that "implementation-defined"
and "implementation-dependent" appear in the document, that's
what an index is for, so we should generate one and put those in as indexed
terms.
I added the appendix of DFDL Standard Character
Set Encodings, which includes both 7-bit and 6-bit flavors now.
I believe the last thing to do is bit order, but that should be reviewed
as a separate document first.
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF
Intellectual Property Policy
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU