Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.pglaf.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Does OGF have any sort of trade-mark or brand protection on the DFDL acronym? or even on "OGF DFDL"? I noticed this new use of the acronym DFDL: http://signal.ee.psu.edu/research/dfdl.html There is plenty of other use of DFDL already: Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 4.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: psu.edu] 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4944] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider [mbeckerle.dfdl[at]gmail.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 0.0 FSL_BULK_SIG Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe 2.0 URI_DOTEDU Has .edu URI The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.