[DFDL-WG] spec bug in dfdl:hexBinary function example

In discussion of the dfdl:hexBinary function, it says literals are given the smallest signed type that will hold them. This example is therefore incorrect: • dfdl:hexBinary(208) is the hexBinary value "D0". EXB Should be value 00D0 since 208 is beyond the range of a signed byte, so must be a signed short. Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | www.tresys.com Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy http://www.ogf.org/About/abt_policies.php