attempt to clarify an overlapping conceptualization........ (pseudo-truth 2 (truth N)) <===> ((pT 2) truth N) [pT <---> T] [pT <---> T] ...these are the more accurate dynamics, though even moreso: (pseudo-truth 2 (truth N)) <===> ((pT 2) truth N) [pT.binary <---> t.N) [pT.binary <---> t.N) skipped a step in the diagram above, meant to correlate how pT & binarism are symbiotic and often correlate with ideology and 'closed' rationalizations, though the original approach referenced 'machine 2' that suddenly morphed into representing a 2-value or binary relation, viz. symmetry with machine N. (such frameworks probably need to be broken down into 2 or 3x more detail to actually get into the mechanisms, so these are only abstract sketches, though could be further described as structures or 'additional variables'...) though the appearance may indicate otherwise, from a biased perspective.

truth would be moving throughout this system, and the emulation of it {its *mimicking* via pseudo-truth} would likewise be transferred, yet only one version is accurate at the level of verification as truth, while the other validates and relies upon its [signage] instead. this is the fundamental issue of patterns and their connection with truth, in a security context, as related to "information" and quasi-entropy, entropy-as-sign and entropy-as-truth.

(note: wrote mask for some reason above, i think that was inadvertent bullshit because it makes no sense, stills do not have the words to describe what is going on, abstraction level too high, too confusing the overlapping frameworks of multiple meaning, though wanted to to attempt to make a correction via the diagram that follows..) forgot to diagram the 'information' transfer via the exchange, as the differing models migrate toward their associated models. in this way... (pT 2 (truth N)) <=:=> ((pT 2) truth N) : pT <--------:-------- [pT = pT] : [T = T] --------:--------> T : such that: (pT 2 (truth N)) <=:=> ((pT 2) truth N) : [pT = pT] : [T = T] : -ungrounded- -grounded- relation relation also of potential relevance with regard to information as it relates to entropy, is the proposition that 'truth' precedes falsity and establishes the means to evaluate it. this is something i have concluded after years of thinking about the dynamics though have not formalized it as of yet though it just seems self-evident, especially in terms of the cosmos, everything relates in truth, and the variance within that structure (mutations, anomalies, errors) that is already established in a foundation built within and upon shared truth as framework- literally, ~continuum as truth relates to circuitry, informational scaffolding. this easily gets into Sartre or Heidegger metaphysics, of being and non-being (then related to nothing), as it also involves truth and not-truth in relation to falsity, though this is likewise ambiguous, with /unknowns/ and other fundamental concepts like partial-truth, pseudo-truth (one in the same, in some cases, depending upon if it is distinguished and-or purified as truth, removed of error or structurally reliant upon it for a given view or relation). snooker, eight ball, trickshot