My apologies too. I am in a WLCG Meeting all day. In response to Mike's point on standards taking time; yesbut once a document exists then it is useful right away because sites/systems/infrastructure can choose to follow it and then we benefit from real world feedback on what we have proposed. John
-----Original Message----- From: ur-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ur-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones Sent: 07 February 2012 13:05 To: ur-wg@ogf.org Subject: Re: [UR-WG] Actions for next phone meeting on 07/02/2012
Folks,
My apologies, I will not be able to make the meeting today due to being roped into an NGS Collaboration Board meeting.
I've managed to put one "use case" in the wiki, but...
I will say that there seems to be usecases that are better dealt with using either some monitoring protocol or some advertising protocol.
Remember that URs may not work their way through the system for a time. There is no requirement to provide URs in a timely fashion. To try to make it so would be out of scope for a UR spec.
Status information within a UR will be of limited value, except when exploring usage in a historical context.
Mike
On Monday 06 February 2012 13:21:37 Andrea Cristofori wrote:
Dear all,
I and Jon prepared the agenda for next OGF:
- New charter + Timeline - Info doc from EMI - Wrap up from last OGF - UR2.0 - Requirements - Use cases - Record blocks under consideration - Fields under consideration -AOB
We can discuss tomorrow about it and if we need an extra session. Tomorrow agenda will follow the actions from last phone conference:
- All: write some use cases on the wiki - All: check the attributes on the wiki page and give comments - All: comments on the document: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1953002/StAR-OGF-info-doc-v1.docx - CA & JKN: split the common block in two parts (recordidentity and useridentity) and add some attributes (issuer, authorization type, wheretheusercamefrom,...) - CA & JKN: write a preliminary agenda for next OGF - JKN: change the title on the document to reflect the fact that it is not an OGF document and circulate it before next meeting
Regards, Andrea and Jon
On 01/24/2012 05:17 PM, Andrea Cristofori wrote:
Dear all,
here is a list of actions for next phone meeting
- All: write some use cases on the wiki - All: check the attributes on the wiki page and give comments - All: comments on the document: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1953002/StAR-OGF-info-doc-v1.docx - CA & JKN: split the common block in two parts (recordidentity and useridentity) and add some attributes (issuer, authorization type, wheretheusercamefrom,...) - CA & JKN: write a preliminary agenda for next OGF - JKN: change the title on the document to reflect the fact that it is not an OGF document and circulate it before next meeting
If I forgot something please feel free to add.
Cheers, Andrea -- Scanned by iCritical.