Dear Andrea,
-----Original Message----- From: ur-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ur-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Andrea Cristofori Sent: 23 March 2010 15:49 To: ur-wg@ogf.org Subject: Re: [UR-WG] OGF28 Schedule
Dear all,
While waiting for the minute I'll suggest we can already start to discuss one basic topic that came up during the meeting before we move to more specific things.
- Since the beginning I was thinking just to add new properties to the existing UR definition. This would allow to choose those that are needed in each situation and reuse those that are common. In case of new versions of the UR definition if we update a property then is not needed to update all the definition if this is common. Not all of us agreed with that and it was proposed to create a different usage record for the Storage. What do you think? I think it is indeed a good idea to continue this basic discussion first and reach consensus. Here is my thinking. The basic question is if you really are describing different things, or properties of totally different objects? Then probably the answer should be yes, because it's CPU usage vs storage (and networks can be another). Still you can use a common schema and use for instance a type property saying what usage is published. The problem in using a common schema can arise if some property has a different meaning depending on the type of usage. And also if you discuss changes you always have to keep in mind the different types, which may block progress. So, probably separate schemas will be the best roadmap in the end. Probably it would be best to collect the different arguments and then try to decide?
Best regards, Jules
- What would you prefer to do in case we discuss other property not directly connected with storage accounting? Should we include everything in the discussion now or concentrate only on this topic and try to finalize an update before moving to other things?
Cheers Andrea
P.S.: here is the link
http://www.ogf.org/gf/event_schedule/?id=2029
On 03/18/2010 05:15 PM, Andrea Cristofori wrote:
Dear all,
I have uploaded the slide I presented in Munich last Monday. As soon as we check the minute of the discussion I will upload the file, we can continue the discussion and decide how to proceed.
Cheers Andrea
On 03/10/2010 04:40 PM, Andrea Cristofori wrote:
Dear all,
We have a session scheduled for Monday, March 15 from 4:00 pm to 5:30 pm Location: HGB-A 016.
Agenda: - UR for Storage Accounting discussion - AUR discussion - AOB
If you want to add or change something on the agenda please let me know. I'm plannig to prepare some slide to show to the people present
On 03/18/2010 05:19 PM, Andrea Cristofori wrote: there
that can be a starting point for the discussion.
Cheers Andrea
-- Andrea Cristofori INFN-CNAF Viale Berti Pichat 6/2 40127 Bologna Italy Tel. : +39-051-6092920 Skype: andrea-cnaf
-- ur-wg mailing list ur-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ur-wg