Laura F McGinnis wrote:
* Appendix D title is in wrong style; must have been marked as Courier, 9pt by accident.
By design, so that the lines don't split unnecessarily (see your comment about setting the Examples in setion 14 to Courier 9pt).
Well, I'd put the appendix title at least in the usual font; the font size is less irksome there. Not that I mind if the title wraps; it's line wrapping in the middle of an XML attribute value that I don't care for.
* The cells of the survey results table (section A-2, pages 44-49) would be better off being marked as having North West cell alignment
What does "North West cell alignment" mean?
Umm, it means "top left". I tend to think of cell alignments in terms of compass directions. :-) In table cells you can control not only whether they are left or right aligned, but also whether they are top/bottom aligned (used when they don't fill all the space available due to other cells on the same line having more visual lines of content). When I set this in my documents, I select the cells I want to change, right-click to get the context menu and pick the likely looking thing off a submenu.
* Appendix C should note that SI usage requires "kiB" for 1024 bytes, "MiB" for 1024 kiB, etc. It's stupid, but "standard". It's also a large part of the reason why JSDL dropped putting units in. :-\
What is "SI Usage"? How should this be noted in Appendix C?
Apparently, we're supposed to use 1MB to refer to 1000000 bytes and 1MiB to refer to 1048576 bytes (== 1024kiB, 1kiB == 1024 bytes). I hate this usage, but it is standard. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix has lots of gory details, including links to more discussion. I prefer to put everything in bytes or bits and use very big numbers. :-)
Everything else has been corrected or is OK ("extra commas" are a British versus American issue :)).
I just highlight them because Word's grammar checker doesn't like them (and yes, it was using the US grammar engine at that point). :-) Donal.