April 2009 - ur-wg - lists.ogf.org

extending Usage Records
by Pontz, Tobias 28 Apr '09

28 Apr '09

Hi everyone, are there possibilities for extending usage records with xml-elements, e.g. ... <ur:resource ur:description="jsdl"> <jsdl:JobDescription> <jsdl:Application> <jsdl:ApplicationName>/bin/true</jsdl:ApplicationName> </p:Application> </jsdl:JobDescription> </ur:resource> ... I know that the example won't work because ur:resource is of type string. I am looking for a possibility without modifying the ur-schema. Best regards, Tobias -- Dipl. Wirt.-Inform. Tobias Pontz Information Systems Institute University of Siegen, Germany Skype: tobias.pontz

2 3

Re: [UR-WG] APEL vs UR comparison
by Andrea Cristofori 10 Apr '09

10 Apr '09

Dear John, Ok thanks. I'll wait her return then. I just want to add that for example there are Multidisciplinary VOs. From the CIC portal: https://cic.gridops.org/index.php?section=vo&vo=balticgrid In this case you would map different Projectname with the same VO. I've also been told that there is at least an example in Italy of an experiment (compass) that has two VOs associated (compass and compassit). I do not know if it's part of EGEE but it would be a problem with this kind of mapping. In this case there would be a mapping of two different Projectname for 2 VOs but in fact the Projctname should be the same. Regards, Andrea Gordon, JC (John) wrote: > Andrea, Cristina is away until after Easter. I know that we felt that > the Vortual Organisation name was the best mapping for Projectname in UR > but I don't know what value we write into Jobname. > > Regards, > > John > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ur-wg-bounces(a)ogf.org [mailto:ur-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf >> > Of > >> Andrea Cristofori >> Sent: 08 April 2009 04:23 >> To: Del Cano Novales, C (Cristina) >> Cc: Rosario M. Piro; ur-wg(a)ogf.org; Tiziana Ferrari >> Subject: Re: [UR-WG] APEL vs UR comparison >> >> >> Dear Cristina, >> >> I have a question regarding the mapping you provided: >> why you map the ProjectName as the ur:JobName? >> Shouldn't they be 2 different things? >> >> Regards, >> Andrea >> >> >> >> Del Cano Novales, C (Cristina) wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I attach the document comparing the APEL schema with the UR >>> specification. You can find how APEL describes both individual and >>> aggregated records and the extra fields it uses. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Cristina <<APEL.doc>> >>> >>> ***Cristina del Cano Novales* >>> >>> Scientific Technology Computing / e-Science >>> >>> Science and Technology Facilities Council >>> >>> Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >>> >>> Harwell Science and Innovation Campus >>> >>> Didcot OX11 0XQ >>> >>> Tel: 0044(0)1235 445778 >>> >>> e-mail: ___cristina.del-cano-novales(a)stfc.ac.uk_ >>> <mailto:cristina.del-cano-novales@stfc.ac.uk> >>> >>> >>> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> --- >> >>> Scanned by iCritical. >>> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> --- >> >>> -- >>> ur-wg mailing list >>> ur-wg(a)ogf.org >>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ur-wg >>> >> -- >> ur-wg mailing list >> ur-wg(a)ogf.org >> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ur-wg >>

1 0

Session Requests for OGF26
by Donal K. Fellows 08 Apr '09

08 Apr '09

Hi everyone Sorry I've been a bit quiet, but at least I've remembered one important thing: as we discussed in Catania, I've asked for two sessions in Chapel Hill (before today's deadline!): • Working Session — for our experiences document work. • Alignment/Production Profile Session — for working out how to convert the UR into something more useful for modern grids. The current session details should be visible online on www.ogf.org, but I can't be sure about that (the session booking page is sometimes awkward when it comes to viewing existing session requests). Let me know as soon as possible if there are any issues with this. Donal.

1 0

APEL vs UR comparison
by Del Cano Novales, C (Cristina) 08 Apr '09

08 Apr '09

Dear all, I attach the document comparing the APEL schema with the UR specification. You can find how APEL describes both individual and aggregated records and the extra fields it uses. Regards, Cristina <<APEL.doc>> Cristina del Cano Novales Scientific Technology Computing / e-Science Science and Technology Facilities Council Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Harwell Science and Innovation Campus Didcot OX11 0XQ Tel: 0044(0)1235 445778 e-mail: cristina.del-cano-novales(a)stfc.ac.uk -- Scanned by iCritical.

3 3

Initial draft of exp. doc with 'experiences presentation' included
by Steve Crouch 01 Apr '09

01 Apr '09

Hi All, I've done a first rough pass of putting the UR experiences presentation material into an experiences document - see attached. You'll have to excuse the doc styling, the template is a bit lacking in this area! I've also added in some text around the content for starters, which I expect will need to be changed, but haven't added else much to the core text yet. I haven't redone the diagrams, including a single one for each use case from the presentation. I would like to be sure this is progressing in an acceptable fashion first before making more detailed changes. Any comments/suggestions very welcome! Regards, Steve Crouch -- Dr Stephen Crouch, Software Architect, OMII-UK, Electronics and Computer Science, Room 4067, Level 4, Building 32, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 8787 EMail: s.crouch(a)omii.ac.uk Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 3045 WWW: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~stc

1 0