
8 Dec
2004
8 Dec
'04
8:50 a.m.
In recent meetings that I have attended, the issue that "VOs might not be legal" has surfaced a couple of times. Of course, the illegitimacy of a VO depends on you define and operate a VO for a certain community. But the basic argument goes like this: in a loosely coupled, non-centralized community, there is no point of control that can be held responsible for the sharing of information considered "sensitive" from a legal standpoint: Health and business regulations (not to mention data privacy laws) often require such a single entity. Other examples that fit this description is world-wide file-sharing of copyrighted material and cryptographic software. Does anyone have more insights on this matter? Regards, /Olle