Hi Dane, I hope you recovered from Athens :-) How should we proceed on the SAGA security front? Should we try to thrwo some more use cases at you right now, or should we first try to solve tghose which are on the table? We had the chance to talk to some GFS folx in Athens before we left - they encouraged us to go for ACLs for file permissions. Would you agree that ACLs are likely to be _the_ way to go for file permissions? Would that also be ok for replica systems and information systems? (SAGA has a notion of name_spaces, which are used for information systems, logical files and physical files). Cheers, Andre. Quoting [Dane Skow] (Feb 14 2006):
Cc: SAGA RG
, mulmo@pdc.kth.se From: Dane Skow Subject: Re: SAGA and Security Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:29:15 +0200 To: Andre Merzky Groan, I just realized that my presentation at the GT4 workshop is at 10:30 session on Wednesday AM so a 3-way conflict. I don't think either Olle or I would be able to make that session. I think Anne's case below is an interesting example to walk through. Let's continue this thread in email.
Dane
On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:31 AM, Andre Merzky wrote:
Hi Dane,
thanks for the remarks and corrections - I should have known that its not _that_ easy as I thought ;-) It would be perfect to have you at the Wednesday session!
-- "So much time, so little to do..." -- Garfield
participants (1)
-
Andre Merzky