Re: [SAGA-RG] minutes from the OGF21 session on the Java language binding
Hi Dan, cold you please clarify, or send us a pointer, on what you meant in the session? I may have misunderstood your comment... Thanks, Andre. Quoting [Ceriel Jacobs] (Oct 19 2007):
Andre Merzky wrote:
Some comments below
Another comment from Dan was that method templates/generics should work in Java 5, e.g.:
saga::file f = ...; saga::task t = f.get_size <Async> (); ssize_t s = t.get_result <ssize_t> ();
okok, that is C++, but the point is that something similar is supposedly working in Java as well.
Not true. There are no method templates in Java.
Ceriel
-- No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, however, a significant number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Ah, just saw your mail - thanks :-) A. Quoting [Andre Merzky] (Oct 19 2007):
From: Andre Merzky <andre@merzky.net> To: Ceriel Jacobs <ceriel@cs.vu.nl>, SAGA RG <saga-rg@ogf.org> Cc: Andre Merzky <andre@merzky.net>, Daniel Templeton <Dan.Templeton@Sun.COM> Subject: Re: [SAGA-RG] minutes from the OGF21 session on the Java language binding
Hi Dan,
cold you please clarify, or send us a pointer, on what you meant in the session? I may have misunderstood your comment...
Thanks, Andre.
Quoting [Ceriel Jacobs] (Oct 19 2007):
Andre Merzky wrote:
Some comments below
Another comment from Dan was that method templates/generics should work in Java 5, e.g.:
saga::file f = ...; saga::task t = f.get_size <Async> (); ssize_t s = t.get_result <ssize_t> ();
okok, that is C++, but the point is that something similar is supposedly working in Java as well.
Not true. There are no method templates in Java.
Ceriel
-- No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, however, a significant number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
OK, I see. Dan knows Java better than I do. Sorry. Time to go on holiday :-) Ceriel
Quoting [Ceriel Jacobs] (Oct 19 2007):
OK, I see. Dan knows Java better than I do. Sorry.
So that would work you think? Cool!
Time to go on holiday :-)
Hope you enjoy it! :-)) Cheers, Andre.
Ceriel
-- No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, however, a significant number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
participants (2)
-
Andre Merzky -
Ceriel Jacobs