Yep, thats an error - all c'tors should be able to throe NotImplemented. So, thats a good occasion to test the errata procedure :-) Thanks, Andre. Quoting [Thilo Kielmann] (Jan 24 2008):
From: Thilo Kielmann <kielmann@cs.vu.nl> To: saga-rg@ogf.org Subject: [SAGA-RG] Fwd (ceriel@cs.vu.nl): [saga-cvs] "SAGA-RG/SAGA-Bindings/Java/OGF/src/org/ogf/saga/file FileFactory.java"
Hmm,
do we now have the first item for the "errata" document? ;-)
Thilo
----- Forwarded message from Ceriel Jacobs <ceriel@cs.vu.nl> -----
To: saga-cvs@cct.lsu.edu From: Ceriel Jacobs <ceriel@cs.vu.nl> Subject: [saga-cvs] "SAGA-RG/SAGA-Bindings/Java/OGF/src/org/ogf/saga/file FileFactory.java"
Update of /projects/SAGA-RG/SAGA-Bindings/Java/OGF/src/org/ogf/saga/file In directory asylum.cct.lsu.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv30810/src/org/ogf/saga/file
Modified Files: FileFactory.java Log Message: Inconsistency in the SAGA specification: Buffer constructor throws NotImplemented, but IOVec does'nt? In the Java version, it does now!
_______________________________________________ saga-cvs mailing list saga-cvs@cct.lsu.edu https://mail.cct.lsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/saga-cvs
----- End forwarded message ----- -- No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, however, a significant number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.