Ah, no, we are not saying open via gridftp would fail, only that it happens to be performed by http. Obviously, open must succeed for any protocol which would later succeed in any operation... The paragraph only says: we first open with http (just because), and the read with gridftp. Andre. Quoting [Thilo Kielmann] (Oct 16 2007):
Open a file via http and read it via ftp...
If ftp cannot open it, why/how can it read it??? (and vice versa)
A more convincing example would be better.
Thilo
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:07:29AM -0700, Andre Merzky wrote:
From: Andre Merzky <andre@merzky.net> To: SAGA RG <saga-rg@ogf.org> Cc: Thilo Kielmann <kielmann@cs.vu.nl> Subject: Re: [saga-cvs] "SAGA-RG/Strawman saga_core_design.tex"
Hmm, why do you think that example is bad?
Andre.
Quoting [Thilo Kielmann] (Oct 16 2007):
To: saga-cvs@cct.lsu.edu From: Thilo Kielmann <kielmann@cs.vu.nl> Subject: [saga-cvs] "SAGA-RG/Strawman saga_core_design.tex"
Update of /projects/SAGA-RG/Strawman In directory asylum.cct.lsu.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv32382
Modified Files: saga_core_design.tex Log Message: typo and grammar fixes in section 2 upto and including 2.4
added 2 missing look&feel names for "must implement" in 2.4
first paragraph of 2.4.1 (early binding): This is a silly example; can we think of any better??
_______________________________________________ saga-cvs mailing list saga-cvs@cct.lsu.edu https://mail.cct.lsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/saga-cvs
-- No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, however, a significant number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
-- No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, however, a significant number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.