I think its easiest to have the calls on the task instead of the object creationg the task - maybe that was the intent all along. I thnks that would give no conflicts. However, error handling for the following two call would be different then: 1) dir.copy (a, b); 2) task t = dir.copy <task> (a, b); In the first case, the error would be attached to the dir instance. In the second case, it would be attached to the task instance. Cheers, Andre. Quoting [Andre Merzky] (Apr 20 2006):
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:57:08 +0200 From: Andre Merzky <andre@merzky.net> To: SAGA RG <saga-rg@ggf.org> Subject: ISSUE 130
130) clearify the error handler interface for async calls - OPEN, URGENT
I am unsure how the error handler interface applies to asynchroneous calls. Opinions? Tom, did you consider this?
Cheers, Andre. -- "So much time, so little to do..." -- Garfield