
20 Feb
2008
20 Feb
'08
3:21 p.m.
Hi, I was just making the agreed chnages to the SD spec when I relaiszed that you said to use saga::<package>::<class> with package and class according to the implementation language. This won't work easily as means altering the string from the information service or wherever it comes from according to the chosen language. I think that a service type must be independent of the chosen language and so taken from the spec. With this in mind I want to include an example which would be the job_service on p180 of GFD.90. Should this be saga::job::job_service. Given that the package is actually saga.job then perhaps the best name would be saga.job.job_service i.e. <package>.<class> where the package always starts with "saga." Steve