Hi Ole, On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Ole Weidner <ole.weidner@rutgers.edu> wrote:
Hi Andre, All
I was just thinking through some practical / convenient improvements for the Python Language bindings. Do you think it would make sense to allow creation of a saga.job.Description from a dictionary, e.g.,
jd = saga.job.Description({'Executable':'/bin/sleep', 'Arguments':['60']})
I should have added that in the bindings - the implementation allows that already. Thanks!
IMHO this would be a very nice, optional addition. In conjunction with the already existing attributes_as_dict(), the API would become more 'symmetric' and would allow not only serialization but also convenient de-serialization.
Also, *please* rename attributes_as_dict() to as_dict(). The attribute_ prefix is redundant (Attributes.attributes_as_dict()) and as_dict() is just more commonly used.
Makes sense. Best, Andre.
Cheers, Ole
On Nov 9, 2012, at 20:32 , Andre Merzky <andre@merzky.net> wrote:
Yes, sure! I am still working on the parameter types/names/documentation, and will send it around as soon as that is done.
The sources are as always in the redmine git.
Best, Andre.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Steve Fisher <dr.s.m.fisher@gmail.com> wrote:
Andre, Will you circulate a new PDF when you want us to read it again? Steve
-- Nothing is really difficult... -- saga-rg mailing list saga-rg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/saga-rg
-- Nothing is really difficult...